| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
|---|---|
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
| Area of Residence | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
| Approved Loan made | 69 | 02 | 71 |
| Approved Not made | 18 | 00 | 18 |
| Rejected | 51 | 01 | 52 |
| Total | 138 | 03 | 141 |
| Lowest Income: | $8,820 | Highest Income: | $315,000 |
|---|
| Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
|---|---|---|
| $5,858,588 | 71 | $82,515 |
| Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
| Number of Loans | 06 | 07 | 06 | 08 | 08 | 36 | 71 |
| Percentage of Loans | 8.45% | 9.86% | 8.45% | 11.27% | 11.27% | 50.7% | 100% |
| Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
|---|---|---|
| Revolving Loans | 00 | 0% |
| Partnership Loans | ||
| Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 10 | 14.08% |
| With interest buy-down only | 00 | 0% |
| With loan guarantee only | 61 | 85.92% |
| With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
| Total | 71 | 100% |
| Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
|---|---|---|
| Revolving Loans | 00 | $0 |
| Partnership Loans | 71 | $1,986,151 |
| Total | 71 | $1,986,151 |
| Lowest | 3% |
|---|---|
| Highest | 4% |
| Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
|---|---|---|
| 218 | 71 | 3.07042253521127% |
| Interest Rate | Number of loans |
|---|---|
| 0.0% to 2.0% | 00 |
| 2.1% to 4.0% | 71 |
| 4.1% to 6.0% | 00 |
| 6.1% to 8.0% | 00 |
| 8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
| 10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
| 12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
| 14.1% + | 00 |
| Total | 71 |
| Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | 01 | $3,500 |
| Hearing | 10 | $35,211 |
| Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 00 | $0 |
| Daily living | 01 | $595 |
| Environmental adaptations | 05 | $40,976 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 52 | $1,899,329 |
| Computers and related | 02 | $6,540 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
| Total | 71 | $1,986,151 |
| Number Loans in default | 06 |
|---|---|
| Net loss for loans in default | $55,460 |
| How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 00 |
|---|
| How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 00 |
|---|
The Assistive Technology Loan Program (ATLP) provides loans for a variety of devices including adapted vehicles, vision aids, and hearing aids. During FY18, the ATLP issued 11 loans for hearing aids, all of which impact the individual consumer's life in monumental ways. One applicant in particular was elderly, low income, and losing her hearing. Although hesitant to take on an added debt, she was aware that she absolutely needed hearing aids to maintain her independence. After working with ATLP staff, she felt more comfortable taking on the loan, made a point to follow up to let staff know that now she feels far more secure functioning in social situations, hearing church sermons, and retaining her dignity.
Ms. S works fulltime and utilizes Paratransit in Maryland to get back and forth to her job. Ms. S is a triple-amputee with good credit and work history. Because of the desire to increase her employment options within her company and more flexibly attend meetings off site, Ms. S applied to the AT Loan Program to finance an adapted vehicle. This loan has allowed her to purchase a new, adapted vehicle and improve her chances to advance her career.
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 26 | 26 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 01 | 16 | 17 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 4. Subtotal | 00 | 01 | 42 | 43 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 00 | 01 | 42 | 43 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 09 | 19 | 28 |
| 8. Total | 00 | 10 | 61 | 71 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | 10% | 68.85% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 11 | 15.49% |
| Satisfied | 32 | 45.07% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 28 | 39.44% |
| Total Surveyed | 71 | |
| Response rate % | 60.56% |
The Maryland Technology Assistance Program did not have a contract with AT Discount Sales and Services (a discounted cooperative buying program in Maryland) during FY2018. Because of the absence of this contract, our state financing numbers reflect only the activities of our alternative financing program (low interest financial loans). However, for FY19, MDTAP has reinstated the contract to provide discounted AT services and this activity will be counted in the FY2019 report.
| Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
|---|---|
| A. Device Exchange | 19 |
| B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 18 |
| C. Total | 37 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure | 01 |
| E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients | 00 |
| F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 36 |
If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Recipient out-of-state
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Hearing | 01 | $250 | $0 | $250 |
| Speech Communication | 01 | $2,995 | $0 | $2,995 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 08 | $16,900 | $700 | $16,200 |
| Daily Living | 07 | $11,965 | $0 | $11,965 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 01 | $7,500 | $800 | $6,700 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 01 | $25,000 | $0 | $25,000 |
| Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Total | 19 | $64,610 | $1,500 | $63,110 |
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 02 | $3,000 | $0 | $3,000 |
| Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 13 | $2,065 | $0 | $2,065 |
| Daily Living | 05 | $163 | $0 | $163 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 06 | $230 | $0 | $230 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Total | 26 | $5,458 | $0 | $5,458 |
S.R works with individuals with disabilities. She has requested various items from our reuse listings for her clients. Many of these items are too expensive to be purchased new. In September, 2018, she was able to obtain a Stannah Chair lift at no cost for a savings of $3,000 in order to give an individual the ability to go up and down the stairs in their home.
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 24 | 24 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 09 | 09 |
| 4. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 33 | 33 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 03 | 03 |
| 6. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 36 | 36 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 00 | 00 | 36 | 36 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | NaN% | 91.67% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 35 | 94.59% |
| Satisfied | 01 | 2.7% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 01 | 2.7% |
| Total Surveyed | 37 | |
| Response rate % | 97.3% |
| Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
|---|---|
| Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 147 |
| Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 07 |
| Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 27 |
| Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 05 |
| Total | 186 |
| Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers |
|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 87 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 40 |
| Representative of Education | 14 |
| Representative of Employment | 13 |
| Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 14 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 14 |
| Representatives of Technology | 04 |
| Total | 186 |
| Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 30 |
|---|
| Type of AT Device | Number |
|---|---|
| Vision | 66 |
| Hearing | 34 |
| Speech Communication | 43 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 02 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 08 |
| Daily Living | 08 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 16 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
| Computers and Related | 62 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 01 |
| Total | 240 |
K. M. is a middle-aged man who is suddenly losing his vision. He wants to continue to work and is enrolled in classes at Blind Industries and Services of Maryland (BISM) to learn Braille. K. M. was able to borrow the Perkins Brailler and a Braille note taker to practice his Braille. The loan made it possible for him to complete coursework and to decide on a Braille note taker to purchase.
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 36 | 18 | 44 | 98 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 11 | 05 | 23 | 39 |
| Subtotal | 47 | 23 | 67 | 137 |
| Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
| Subtotal | 47 | 23 | 68 | 138 |
| Nonrespondent | 01 | 01 | 07 | 09 |
| Total | 48 | 24 | 75 | 147 |
| Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 98.53% | |
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 02 | 02 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 01 | 28 | 29 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 4. Subtotal | 00 | 01 | 30 | 31 |
| 5. None of the above | 02 | 01 | 03 | 06 |
| 6. Subtotal | 02 | 02 | 33 | 37 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 01 | 02 |
| 8. Total | 03 | 02 | 34 | 39 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 0% | 50% | 90.91% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 169 | 90.86% |
| Satisfied | 13 | 6.99% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 04 | 2.15% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total Surveyed | 186 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
|---|---|
| Vision | 42 |
| Hearing | 33 |
| Speech Communication | 29 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 07 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 10 |
| Daily Living | 09 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 01 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
| Computers and Related | 10 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 |
| Total # of Devices Demonstrated | 141 |
| Type of Participant | Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations |
|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 133 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 87 |
| Representatives of Education | 19 |
| Representatives of Employment | 03 |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 06 |
| Representative of Community Living | 13 |
| Representative of Technology | 00 |
| Total | 261 |
| Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
|---|---|
| Funding Source (non-AT program) | 10 |
| Service Provider | 16 |
| Vendor | 58 |
| Repair Service | 00 |
| Others | 00 |
| Total | 84 |
H.W. is a middle-aged man with cognitive impairments. He wanted a device he could speak into to ask questions or help him spell words. Staff demonstrated the Kindle Fire with the Alexa app and H.W. was successful in using it. He purchased one for himself and is pleased with it.
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 15 | 08 | 72 | 95 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 04 | 03 | 04 | 11 |
| Subtotal | 19 | 11 | 76 | 106 |
| Have not made a decision | 02 | 09 | 20 | 31 |
| Subtotal | 21 | 20 | 96 | 137 |
| Nonrespondent | 04 | 00 | 00 | 04 |
| Total | 25 | 20 | 96 | 141 |
| Performance on this measure | 76% | 55% | 79.17% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 223 | 85.44% |
| Satisfied | 38 | 14.56% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total | 261 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 52 | 52 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 02 | 44 | 46 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 09 | 09 |
| 4. Subtotal | 00 | 02 | 105 | 107 |
| 5. None of the above | 02 | 01 | 06 | 09 |
| 6. Subtotal | 02 | 03 | 111 | 116 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 01 | 09 | 20 | 30 |
| 8. Total | 03 | 12 | 131 | 146 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 0% | 16.67% | 80.15% | 73.29% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 75% | 75% | 75% | 75% |
| Met/Not Met | Not Met | Not Met | Met | Not Met |
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 51 | 26 | 116 | 193 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 15 | 08 | 27 | 50 |
| Subtotal | 66 | 34 | 143 | 243 |
| Have not made a decision | 02 | 09 | 21 | 32 |
| Subtotal | 68 | 43 | 164 | 275 |
| Nonrespondent | 05 | 01 | 07 | 13 |
| Total | 73 | 44 | 171 | 288 |
| Performance on this measure | 90.41% | 77.27% | 83.63% | 84.38% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% |
| Met/Not Met | Met | Met | Met | Met |
| Type of Participant | Number |
|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 154 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 78 |
| Representatives of Education | 158 |
| Representatives of Employment | 82 |
| Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 191 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 105 |
| Representatives of Technology | 00 |
| Unable to Categorize | 17 |
| TOTAL | 785 |
| Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 713 | 72 | 00 | 785 |
| Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
|---|---|
| AT Products/Services | 552 |
| AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 23 |
| Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 00 |
| Combination of any/all of the above | 174 |
| Transition | 36 |
| Total | 785 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
On June 20, 2018 staff presented at the Baltimore Fire Academy. The presentation included an overview of assistive technology and emergency situations. Attendees were shown what types of devices individuals might be using during an emergency evacuation, either small or large scale. First responders were made aware of these devices so they know what they look like, what they are used for, and why it is necessary to bring the devices with the individual as they evacuate.
Breifly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
On April 7, 2018 staff presented at the Expo for Transitioning Youth in Harford County. The students and family members who attended learned about the various apps that could help with the transition from high school to higher education or the workplace. There has been follow-up from some of these families to see more demonstrations of these apps and to borrow various devices.
Breifly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
| Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
|---|---|
| IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 00 |
| Training or Technique Assistance will be developed or implemented | 00 |
| No known outcome at this time | 00 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 |
| Total | 00 |
| Performance Measure Percentage | NaN% |
| RSA Target Percentage | 70% |
| Met/Not Met | Not Met |
| Education | 0% |
|---|---|
| Employment | 0% |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 0% |
| Community Living | 100% |
| Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 0% |
| Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
The Maryland Technology Assistance Program worked closely with the Maryland Department of Aging and each of their Maryland Access Points (MAPs) to evaluate their assistive technology needs, provide assistive technology training to staff, and support their development of assistive technology kits/libraries in each office. The MAP offices will each house their own set of assistive technology devices and policies regarding how and when they provide or demonstrate these devices to their constituents.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. On April 4, 2018 staff exhibited at the Carroll County Senior Expo. Over 150 people attended and gained knowledge about MDTAP and the Assistive Technology Loan Program. This event was geared at senior citizens in Maryland, an increasing large population that has expressed greater needs for devices to retain independence and stay in their homes. We have had quite a few individuals contact MDTAP for demos, loans and information because of this event.
2. On October 4, 2017, staff exhibited at the Howard County Transition Fair. Over 100 family members and students attended the fair. They were able to gain information on various AT apps and devices that could be used as they transition out of high school. Some individuals have since come in to see and borrow items both for their transition into higher education and for transitions into the workforce.
| Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 443 | 44 | 487 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 167 | 10 | 177 |
| Representative of Education | 50 | 00 | 50 |
| Representative of Employment | 39 | 01 | 40 |
| Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 81 | 02 | 83 |
| Representative of Community Living | 125 | 02 | 127 |
| Representative of Technology | 27 | 00 | 27 |
| Unable to Categorize | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 932 | 59 | 991 |
| State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 01 |
|---|
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
During FY18, the Maryland Technology Assistance Program provided direct support to the Maryland Department of Disabilities Director of Emergency Preparedness. This work culminated in the final draft of a Standard Operating Procedure for MDOD Accessibility kits, and the creation of 12 assistive technology kits available at every shelter location in the state of Maryland.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
The Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for MDOD Accessibility Kits is a document made available to all shelters across the state that serve in a capacity to support victims of natural disasters, emergencies, etc. The SOP accompanies access to the physical assistive technology kit, which includes a variety of low-tech and mid-tech devices available to accommodate and facilitate the needs of individuals with a variety of cognitive, physical, and developmental disabilities. The SOP can obtained from Cecilia Warren, Director of Emergency Preparedness, with the Maryland Department of Disabilities.
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Community Living
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
| Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? | No |
|---|
| Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds |
|---|
| Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Individuals Served | Other Outcome |
|---|
Association of Assistive Technology Act Programs . Saved: Wed Mar 13 2019 13:50:24 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time)