National Assistive Technology Act Data System

Annual Progress Report - Full Report

Connecticut 2018

General Information

Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)

State AT Program Title:
Connecticut Tech Act Project
State AT Program Title:
State AT Program URL
www.CTtechact.com
Mailing Address:
55 Farmington Avenue, 12th Floor
City:
Hartford
State:
CT
Zip Code:
06105
Program Email:
arlene.lugo@ct.gov
Phone:
860-424-4881
TTY:
711

Lead Agency

Agency Name:
Bureau of Rehabilitation Services
Mailing Address:
55 Farmington Avenue, 12th Floor
City:
Hartford
State:
CT
Zip Code:
06105
Program URL:
www.CT.gov/BRS

Implementing Entity

Name of Implementing Agency:
Mailing Address:
City
State:
Zip Code:
Program URL:

Program Director and Other Contacts

Program Director for State AT Program (last, first):
Lugo, Arlene
Title:
Program Director
Phone:
860-424-4881
E-mail:
arlene.lugo@ct.gov
Program Director at Lead Agency (last, first):
Doukas, David
Title:
Vocational Rehabilitation Director
Phone:
860-424-4862
E-mail:
David.Doukas@ct.gov
Primary Contact at Implementing Agency (last, first) - If applicable:
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director

Name (last, first):
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Certifying Representative

Name (last, first):
Doukas, David
Title:
Vocational Rehabilitation Director
Phone:
860-424-4862
E-mail:
David.Doukas@ct.gov

State Financing

Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? Yes
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? Yes

Loan Applications
Area of Residence Total
Metro
RUCC 1-3
Non-Metro
RUCC 4-9
Approved Loan made 04 00 04
Approved Not made 00 00 00
Rejected 02 00 02
Total 06 00 06

2. Income of Applicants to Whom Loans Were Made

Lowest/Highest Incomes
Lowest Income: $8,820 Highest Income: $36,000

Average Income
Sum of Incomes Loans Made Average Annual Income
$99,820 04 $24,955

Number and Percentage of Loans Made to Applicants by Income Range
Income Ranges Total
$15,000
or Less
$15,001-
$30,000
$30,001-
$45,000
$45,001-
$60,000
$60,001-
$75,000
$75,001
or More
Number of Loans 01 01 02 00 00 00 04
Percentage of Loans 25% 25% 50% 0% 0% 0% 100%

3. Loan Type

Loan Type
Type of Loan Number of Loans Percentage of loans
Revolving Loans 00 0%
Partnership Loans
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee 00 0%
With interest buy-down only 00 0%
With loan guarantee only 04 100%
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee 00 0%
Total 04 100%

Loan Type Summary
Type of Loan Number of Loans Dollar Value of Loans
Revolving Loans 00 $0
Partnership Loans 04 $25,042
Total 04 $25,042

4. Interest Rates

Interest Rates
Lowest 4%
Highest 4.5%

Interest Rate Summary
Sum of Interest Rates Number of Loans Made Average Interest Rate
18 04 4.375%

Number of Loans Made by Interest Rate
Interest Rate Number of loans
0.0% to 2.0% 00
2.1% to 4.0% 01
4.1% to 6.0% 03
6.1% to 8.0% 00
8.1% - 10.0% 00
10.1%-12.0% 00
12.1%-14.0% 00
14.1% + 00
Total 04

5. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed

Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed
Type of AT Number of Devices Financed Dollar Value of Loans
Vision 00 $0
Hearing 02 $5,037
Speech communication 00 $0
Learning, cognition, and developmental 00 $0
Mobility, seating and positioning 00 $0
Daily living 00 $0
Environmental adaptations 00 $0
Vehicle modification and transportation 02 $20,005
Computers and related 00 $0
Recreation, sports, and leisure 00 $0
Total 04 $25,042

6. Defaults

Defaults
Number Loans in default 02
Net loss for loans in default $804

B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? 01
Activity 1
How would you describe this state financing activity? telecommunications distribution
2. Geographic Distribution, Number of Individuals Who Acquired AT Devices and Services and Number for whom Performance Measure Data are Collected
Geographic Distribution
County of Residence Individuals Served
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) 08
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) 01
C. Total Served 09

Performance Measure Number
Performance Measure Number
D. Excluded from Performance Measure 00
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 09

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded
Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded
Type of AT Device / Service Number of Devices
Funded
Value of
AT Provided
Vision 14 $10,916
Hearing 06 $906
Speech communication 00 $0
Learning, cognition, and developmental 00 $0
Mobility, seating and positioning 00 $0
Daily living 00 $0
Environmental adaptations 00 $0
Vehicle modification and transportation 00 $0
Computers and related 07 $7,746
Recreation, sports, and leisure 00 $0
Total 27 $19,568


C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? 00

D. Anecdote

A young woman diagnosed with Friedreich’s Ataxia was completing college and needed assistance to hear better in the classroom setting and meeting rooms and for future employment. Her audiologist recommended a microphone/receiver system that works with her hearing aids and costs $2330. She applied for a loan through the Assistive Technology Loan Program. She also received two grants from Raising Awareness for Friedreich’s Ataxia and The FA Project which combined gave her $1300.00 and left her with a more manageable loan amount and monthly payments. This individual’s challenge to obtain work was hindered by not being able to hear in large group settings and this is where the amplification device most positively impacted her. Since obtaining it she has not only done well in college, but she also spoke at a conference and has participated in presentations at Quinnipiac University. She also interned at her town's Court House in the Protective Service Department with Victim Crimes and they are currently working with her towards a permanent position within their department.

Young woman sitting in conference. Presenter is holding the microphone that amplifies directly into her hearing aids.
Impact Area

As part of our National Deaf Blind Equipment Distribution Program (NDBEDP), an evaluator visited a an elderly couple to assess the wife for her telecommunication technology needs, as she was withdrawing from communicating with others and would wait for the phone to ring, but could not dial out. While assessing the wife, the evaluator noticed the husband also had low vision and relied on his daughter to read his mail to him. The evaluator recommended a voice recognition device for the landline phone through the NDBEDP which was approved and provided for the mother and he was able to help the father obtain a grant for a device that would allow him to scan his mail into an electronic format. As a result, the daughter wrote a very kind letter stating, the "two technology-based tools have opened the small world they live in into a wider scope. My mom, who is 97% blind, is now able to call family and friends without needing someone to dial for her. … My dad is so very excited to have the Eye Pal Solo because he can now hear his mail being read to him. These tools have made their lives better and … has given them a piece of their independence that they had lost."

NDBEDP consumer utilizing her new voice dialer to make a phone call
Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 00 01 08 09
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 01 02 03
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 01 01
4. Subtotal 00 02 11 13
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 00 02 11 13
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 00 02 11 13
9. Performance on this measure NaN% 100% 100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 12 92.31%
Satisfied 01 7.69%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 13
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Reutilization

A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices

Activity Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity
A. Device Exchange 02
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan 1,297
C. Total 1,299

Performance Measure
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure 00
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients 00
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 1,299

If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

B. Device Exchange Activities

Device Exchange
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Exchanged Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged Savings to Consumers
Vision 00 $0 $0 $0
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech Communication 00 $0 $0 $0
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 00 $0 $0 $0
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 01 $399 $95 $304
Daily Living 01 $99 $32 $67
Environmental Adaptations 00 $0 $0 $0
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 00 $0 $0 $0
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 02 $498 $127 $371

C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities

Device Reassign/Repair/Refurbish and/or OEL
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold Savings to Consumers
Vision 04 $2,745 $408 $2,337
Hearing 02 $399 $0 $399
Speech Communication 00 $0 $0 $0
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 03 $1,689 $55 $1,634
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 624 $717,024 $103,537 $613,487
Daily Living 499 $107,671 $27,180 $80,491
Environmental Adaptations 354 $196,067 $47,032 $149,035
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 04 $8,600 $700 $7,900
Computers and Related 01 $599 $0 $599
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 21 $13,574 $2,000 $11,574
Total 1,512 $1,048,368 $180,912 $867,456

D. Anecdote

An individual who works at a group home brought a group home resident to the State AT Act Program partner agency, NEAT. The individual with a disability was struggling to stand up straight and his body leaned to the right, making him unstable without help from others. The team was looking for a rollator but because of his height, the NEAT team had to pair him with an extra tall rollator, which was available in inventory. When he first tried the equipment, the smile that ran across his face was proud and warming. This was the first time he was able to stand up straight in years. He was able to obtain the equipment at a significant cost savings.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 04 01 1,291 1,296
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 01 00 01
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 02 00 02
4. Subtotal 04 04 1,291 1,299
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 04 04 1,291 1,299
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 04 04 1,291 1,299
9. Performance on this measure 100% 100% 100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 1,145 88.14%
Satisfied 146 11.24%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 08 0.62%
Total Surveyed 1,299
Response rate % 99.38%

G. Notes:

Our partner agency, the New England Assistive Technology (NEAT) Center closed temporarily at the end of June 2018. The purpose of the closure was to clean out it's space, repaint, purge old and outdated equipment, review policies, procedures and best practices. The intent is to reopen their reuse services before the end of 2018. As a result of this closure, reuse numbers have been impacted and will be greatly reduced in comparison to previous fiscal years. It is our hope that upon reopening with best practices in place the quality of services will be enhanced although the quantity may not be as high as in years past.

Device Loan

A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose

Loans By Purpose
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan Number
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) 288
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding 28
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation 32
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity 27
Total 375

B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower

LOANS By Borrower Type
Type of Individual or Entity Number of Device Borrowers
Individuals with Disabilities 150
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 25
Representative of Education 173
Representative of Employment 06
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 17
Representatives of Community Living 01
Representatives of Technology 03
Total 375

C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans

Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days 30

D. Types of Devices Loaned

Types of Devices Loaned
Type of AT Device Number
Vision 34
Hearing 07
Speech Communication 191
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 227
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 13
Daily Living 19
Environmental Adaptations 20
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00
Computers and Related 258
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 37
Total 806

E. Anecdote

A mom expressed concern over her 5-year-old son who displayed a lack of communication and felt his global development was being negatively impacted, resulting in daily meltdowns with aggression and frustration for all those involved.  An AAC evaluation paid for through a grant, conducted by AT Act partner agency NEAT resulted in recommendation for an iPad with Proloquo2Go with specific customization and implementation strategies tailored to the child’s unique needs. The NEAT’s Lending Library provided the recommended device for use while the family waited for insurance to approve his own device. After 30 days, the child was initiating use of the device for specific functions and was very responsive to others who modeled different vocabulary words on the device for him.  Most notably, the parents and the home-based ABA therapist reported that the child’s negative behaviors had drastically reduced, and his body was generally calmer and in a “ready to learn” state.  He was more attentive to academic material, social engagement opportunities, and language concept tasks. It took a total of 5 months but the family did receive the insurance funded device and were able to transfer the child’s page set from the loaner device to his own, new iPad.  They then returned NEAT’s iPad to make it available for the next individual in need. The child is expected to make significant progress this school year and in the years to come.

Impact Area

F. Access Performance Measures

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 175 10 71 256
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 14 05 02 21
Subtotal 189 15 73 277
Have not made a decision 08 01 00 09
Subtotal 197 16 73 286
Nonrespondent 01 01 00 02
Total 198 17 73 288
Performance on this measure 95.94% 93.75% 100%

G. Acquisition Performance Measures

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 44 08 08 60
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 10 04 01 15
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 05 00 00 05
4. Subtotal 59 12 09 80
5. None of the above 07 00 00 07
6. Subtotal 66 12 09 87
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 66 12 09 87
9. Performance on this measure 89.39% 100% 100%

H. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 225 60%
Satisfied 142 37.87%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 08 2.13%
Total Surveyed 375
Response rate % 97.87%

I. Notes:

Device Demonstration

A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type

Type of AT Device / Service Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services
Vision 96
Hearing 60
Speech Communication 57
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 89
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 06
Daily Living 248
Environmental Adaptations 15
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00
Computers and Related 39
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00
Total # of Devices Demonstrated 610

B. Types of Participants

Demonstrations by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations
Individuals with Disabilities 569
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 78
Representatives of Education 240
Representatives of Employment 05
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 90
Representative of Community Living 41
Representative of Technology 06
Total 1,029

C. Number of Referrals

Referrals
Type of Entity Number of Referrals
Funding Source (non-AT program) 07
Service Provider 11
Vendor 1,328
Repair Service 00
Others 00
Total 1,346

D. Anecdote

A Speech-Language Pathologist with who works on the "Related Services team" at the AT Act Program's partner agency, EASTCONN, was able to obtain an AT demo of the iPad app "Accessible Literacy Learning "(ALL) Curriculum app. After a successful demonstration, she borrowed and used it for a period of a few months with a public school student who is 6 years old, on the Autism spectrum and minimally verbal. Without accessible literacy curricula, students on the Autism spectrum who are minimally verbal do not have access to programs that meet their unique literacy needs. Evidence suggests that though children who are minimally verbal may not learn to speak, many can successfully learn to read and write. After the demonstration and loan of the iPad with the ALL app, the student’s school district determined it would meet the student’s needs and purchased a copy of the app to put on the student’s school iPad for regular use.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 139 09 445 593
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 03 00 09 12
Subtotal 142 09 454 605
Have not made a decision 03 00 02 05
Subtotal 145 09 456 610
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 145 09 456 610
Performance on this measure 97.93% 100% 99.56%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 735 71.43%
Satisfied 293 28.47%
Satisfied somewhat 01 0.1%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total 1,029
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Overall Performance Measures

Overall Acquisition Performance Measure

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 48 10 1,307 1,365
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 10 06 03 19
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 05 02 01 08
4. Subtotal 63 18 1,311 1,392
5. None of the above 07 00 00 07
6. Subtotal 70 18 1,311 1,399
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 70 18 1,311 1,399
9. Performance on this measure 90% 100% 100% 99.5%
ACL Performance Measure 75% 75% 75% 75%
Met/Not Met Met Met Met Met

Overall Access Performance Measure

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 314 19 516 849
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 17 05 11 33
Subtotal 331 24 527 882
Have not made a decision 11 01 02 14
Subtotal 342 25 529 896
Nonrespondent 01 01 00 02
Total 343 26 529 898
Performance on this measure 96.5% 92.31% 99.62% 98.22%
ACL Performance Measure 70% 70% 70% 70%
Met/Not Met Met Met Met Met

Training

A. Training Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution

Training by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number
Individuals with Disabilities 181
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 68
Representatives of Education 1,698
Representatives of Employment 24
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 42
Representatives of Community Living 01
Representatives of Technology 28
Unable to Categorize 21
TOTAL 2,063

Geographic Distribution of Participants
Metro Non Metro Unknown TOTAL
1,715 07 341 2,063

B. Training Topics

Trainings by Topic
Primary Topic of Training Participants
AT Products/Services 650
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice 00
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access 07
Combination of any/all of the above 1,321
Transition 85
Total 2,063

B. Description of Training Activities

Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:

Over the summer, the statewide AT Act program partner the NEAT Center and their entire team conducted a graduate level, AT Course as part of the Teacher Certification Program for College Graduates at the Neag School of Education at the University of Connecticut (UCONN). This course provided training on all aspects and arenas of Assistive Technology. The purpose of the course was to help prepare future Special Education Teachers with knowledge, skills and resources to support all of their students.

Breifly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

The AT Act Program partner, EASTCONN, provided a hands-on training session to teach students ages 18-21 organization, time management and productivity skills by utilizing Assistive Technology. Specifically the training focused on how to use built-in features of their smartphones and specific apps to keep track of appointments, work schedules and to manage their activities, tasks and time. These skills will be invaluable to the students as they transition out of high school and into the world of work, training, or post-secondary education.

Breifly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:

A full day training was provided to a small group of educators and individuals with visual impairments focusing on a Braille device, it's features and ICT. The training provided an emphasis on special features that support ICT accessibility such as creating Braille and text documents in multiple languages. Some teachers of students with visual impairments were present to help students transition into the adult world after high school.

D. IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure

IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received Number
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies 05
Training or Technique Assistance will be developed or implemented 02
No known outcome at this time 00
Nonrespondent 00
Total 07
Performance Measure Percentage 100%
RSA Target Percentage 70%
Met/Not Met Met

E. Notes:

The AT Act Program Director will be participating in a new committee for the state Department of Rehabilitation Services whose focus will be on the accessibility of electronic documents and website accessibility. One of the outcomes of the committee will to be offer training to internal and external entities on creating accessible documents and websites which may lead to higher ICT training numbers in the coming year(s).

Technical Assistance

A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance

Technical Assistance by Recipient Type
Education 21.81%
Employment 65.47%
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 0%
Community Living 0%
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) 12.72%
Total 100%

B. Description of Technical Assistance

Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:

As part of WIOA, the Local Workforce Board were required to undergo certification of the One-Stop Career centers in each region of CT to ensure that at least the primary One-Stop in each area is accessible to individuals with disabilities, from both a physical barrier perspective as well as a programmatic perspective. The AT Act Program Director was assigned to represent the Dept of Rehabilitation Services during the assessment process of 3 regional One-Stop Centers along with 4 affiliate sites. Recommendations to meet the minimum ADA accessibility requirements were made along with recommendations for enhancements for universal design and best practices.

Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

In CT, pre-employment transition services have been rebranded to DORS Level Up. CT AT Act Program Director provides ongoing TA to DORS Level Up Counselors as well as oversees training and operation of the DORS Level Up App and DORS Level Up Camp.

C. Notes:

Public Awareness

Public Awareness Activities

Public Awareness Narratives

Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.

1. As part of an Assistive Technology Forum at the CT Legislative Office Building, sponsored by the CT Autism Coalition, the CT AT Act Program and several partner agencies presented a professional panel on Assistive Technology services offered in CT for individuals with disabilities Across the Lifespan and across all areas of life - home, community, education and employment. There were approximately 150 family members, professionals, community service providers and legislators in the audience. The event was also recorded for the purposes of sharing the information with a wider audience. There is potential impact on legislators and legislation as a result of this forum, along with a plan to do several additional panels specifically focused on disability populations and/or Assistive Technology devices.

2. This high-impact session allowed participants, who were primarily Human Resources representatives, to have experiential learning through various stations of disabilities and Assistive Technology. Afterwards, participants reviewed new insights from their as an individual with a disability; knowledge of, and experience with, state-of-the-art assistive technology; and strategies, outcomes, and lessons learned from leading practice employers of people with disabilities with an emphasis on the benefits of creating disability inclusion in the workplace. 20 employers were represented.

Information And Assistance

Information And Assistance Activities by Recipient
Types of Recipients AT Device/
Service
AT Funding Total
Individuals with Disabilities 146 35 181
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 619 116 735
Representative of Education 86 10 96
Representative of Employment 62 00 62
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 38 05 43
Representative of Community Living 30 07 37
Representative of Technology 21 00 21
Unable to Categorize 00 00 00
Total 1,002 173 1,175

Notes:

Not all Statewide AT Act Program partners collect I&A as a separate data point, as they provide direct services of device lending, demonstrations, or reuse where consumers are counted.

State Improvement Outcomes

State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 00

A. State Improvements

1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.


2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)


3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?


B. State Improvements

1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.


2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)


3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?

Additional And Leveraged Funds

Additional and Leveraged Funds

Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? Yes

A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities

State Plan Activities
Fund Source Amount Use of Funds
Federal$18,377Demonstration
Federal$18,377Technical Assistance
Federal$11,261State Financing
Federal$18,377Device Loan
Federal$18,377Training
Amount: $84,769

B. Leveraged Funding for Activities Not in State Plan (data not previously reported in other activity sections)

Non-State Plan Activities
Fund Source Amount Use of Funds Individuals Served Other Outcome

C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).


Association of Assistive Technology Act Programs . Saved: Wed Mar 13 2019 13:45:00 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time)


Back to state program information page | Top of page

This FY18 State AT Program Annual Progress Report was exported from the National Assistive Technology Act Data System (NATADS). NATADS was developed with partial support from the Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance.