Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
Area of Residence | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
Approved Loan made | 19 | 03 | 22 |
Approved Not made | 01 | 01 | 02 |
Rejected | 00 | 01 | 01 |
Total | 20 | 05 | 25 |
Lowest Income: | $8,892 | Highest Income: | $40,320 |
---|
Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
---|---|---|
$303,739 | 22 | $13,806 |
Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
Number of Loans | 14 | 04 | 04 | 00 | 00 | 00 | 22 |
Percentage of Loans | 63.64% | 18.18% | 18.18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 22 | 100% |
Partnership Loans | 0% | |
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
With interest buy-down only | 00 | 0% |
With loan guarantee only | 00 | 0% |
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
Total | 22 | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 22 | $38,918 |
Partnership Loans | 00 | $0 |
Total | 22 | $38,918 |
Lowest | 0% |
---|---|
Highest | 8% |
Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
---|---|---|
55 | 22 | 2.50363636363636% |
Interest Rate | Number of loans |
---|---|
0.0% to 2.0% | 01 |
2.1% to 4.0% | 11 |
4.1% to 6.0% | 08 |
6.1% to 8.0% | 02 |
8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
14.1% + | 00 |
Total | 22 |
Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Vision | 03 | $4,522 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 |
Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 01 | $3,500 |
Daily living | 12 | $3,977 |
Environmental adaptations | 02 | $5,350 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 01 | $6,000 |
Computers and related | 03 | $15,569 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
Total | 22 | $38,918 |
Number Loans in default | 00 |
---|---|
Net loss for loans in default | $0 |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 01 |
---|
How would you describe this state financing activity? | last resort activity |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 17 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 10 |
C. Total Served | 27 |
Performance Measure | Number |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 27 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded |
Value of
AT Provided |
---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 |
Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 00 | $0 |
Daily living | 00 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 38 | $33,685 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 00 | $0 |
Computers and related | 00 | $0 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
Total | 38 | $33,685 |
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 01 |
---|
How would you describe this state financing activity? | cooperative buying activity |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 907 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 211 |
C. Total Served | 1,118 |
Performance Measure | Number |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 1,118 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device / Service | Number Provided | Total Estimated Current Retail Purchase Price |
Total Price for Which Devices Were Sold |
Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 231 | $7,451 | $2,786 | $4,665 |
Hearing | 11 | $675 | $675 | $675 |
Speech communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 848 | $172,005 | $70,561 | $101,444 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 28 | $4,821 | $1,843 | $2,978 |
Daily living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 1,118 | $186,175 | $75,865 | $110,310 |
Mr. C, 54, has been living in a nursing home after having a stroke. Due to funding and nursing home restrictions, he was only provided a manual wheelchair which he couldn’t propel on his own. After contacting Disability Connections, he was able to receive a refurbished power wheelchair that suited his needs. He was also able to get a new battery for his power wheelchair through our Last Resort Fund. Before receiving the power wheelchair, Mr. C was unable navigate his environment independently. Now he is able to come and go as he desires, which makes him very happy.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 1,118 | 05 | 43 | 1,166 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
4. Subtotal | 1,118 | 05 | 44 | 1,167 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 1,118 | 05 | 44 | 1,167 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 1,118 | 05 | 44 | 1,167 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 1,012 | 86.72% |
Satisfied | 155 | 13.28% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 1,167 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 61 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 5,897 |
C. Total | 5,958 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients | 00 |
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 5,958 |
If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Daily Living | 61 | $7,779 | $584 | $7,195 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 61 | $7,779 | $584 | $7,195 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 5,281 | $2,830,770 | $29,364 | $2,801,406 |
Daily Living | 616 | $263,802 | $21,461 | $242,341 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 5,897 | $3,094,572 | $50,825 | $3,043,747 |
Mrs. H. received a scooter through our reuse program this year which has enhanced her ability to participate in activities with her granddaughter. She shared she was worried about not being able to participate in daily events and significant celebrations such as, her granddaughter's senior recognition night on the football field. Thanks to our FODAC reuse program, Mrs. H. was able to be by her granddaughter's side for this important celebration and for many other daily events!
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 03 | 07 | 5,948 | 5,958 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 03 | 07 | 5,948 | 5,958 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 03 | 07 | 5,948 | 5,958 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 03 | 07 | 5,948 | 5,958 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 5,899 | 99.01% |
Satisfied | 25 | 0.42% |
Satisfied somewhat | 07 | 0.12% |
Not at all satisfied | 27 | 0.45% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 5,958 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 737 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 271 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 266 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 29 |
Total | 1,303 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 655 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 199 |
Representative of Education | 187 |
Representative of Employment | 101 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 79 |
Representatives of Community Living | 47 |
Representatives of Technology | 35 |
Total | 1,303 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 30 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number |
---|---|
Vision | 86 |
Hearing | 11 |
Speech Communication | 35 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 210 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 369 |
Daily Living | 378 |
Environmental Adaptations | 43 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 01 |
Computers and Related | 168 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 02 |
Total | 1,303 |
Mr. H., 46, was in a nursing home after having a stroke that left him with limited mobility. He was able to transition back into his home through a program called Money Follows the Person. He needed independent living aids to increase his independence. To ensure that he was able to use the devices Mr. H borrowed them from Tools for Life's ADRC, Disability Connections, first to try before he bought them. Mr. H determined that he was able to use the devices and purchased them.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 207 | 209 | 321 | 737 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Subtotal | 207 | 209 | 321 | 737 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Subtotal | 207 | 209 | 321 | 737 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 207 | 209 | 321 | 737 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 39 | 34 | 493 | 566 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 39 | 34 | 493 | 566 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 39 | 34 | 493 | 566 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 39 | 34 | 493 | 566 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 1,001 | 76.82% |
Satisfied | 302 | 23.18% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 1,303 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 69 |
Hearing | 36 |
Speech Communication | 54 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 357 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 222 |
Daily Living | 430 |
Environmental Adaptations | 241 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 08 |
Computers and Related | 495 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 20 |
Total # of Devices Loaned | 1,932 |
Type of Participant | Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 802 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 186 |
Representatives of Education | 155 |
Representatives of Employment | 60 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 01 |
Representative of Community Living | 702 |
Representative of Technology | 26 |
Total | 1,932 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 734 |
Service Provider | 316 |
Vendor | 495 |
Repair Service | 387 |
Others | 00 |
Total | 1,932 |
Mrs. E. was diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease over 20 years ago. In 2015, she had spinal stroke that affected the mobility and motor skills of her hands and legs. After her stroke, she was unable to hold, use her cell phone to call people, play games and she could no longer use her camera to take pictures. Mrs. E participated in an AT demonstration to explore different mounting system solutions. It was determined that a simple modular hose with a clamp and acrylic plate to mount her phone on would work best. She is now able to use her phone independently and she is able to take her own photos. This makes her very happy!
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 512 | 60 | 1,305 | 1,877 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 31 | 00 | 24 | 55 |
Subtotal | 543 | 60 | 1,329 | 1,932 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Subtotal | 543 | 60 | 1,329 | 1,932 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 543 | 60 | 1,329 | 1,932 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 1,783 | 92.29% |
Satisfied | 143 | 7.4% |
Satisfied somewhat | 05 | 0.26% |
Not at all satisfied | 01 | 0.05% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total | 1,932 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 1,160 | 46 | 6,484 | 7,690 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
4. Subtotal | 1,160 | 46 | 6,485 | 7,691 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 1,160 | 46 | 6,485 | 7,691 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 1,160 | 46 | 6,485 | 7,691 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
ACL Performance Measure | 75% | 75% | 75% | 75% |
Met/Not Met | Met | Met | Met | Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 719 | 269 | 1,626 | 2,614 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 31 | 00 | 24 | 55 |
Subtotal | 750 | 269 | 1,650 | 2,669 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Subtotal | 750 | 269 | 1,650 | 2,669 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 750 | 269 | 1,650 | 2,669 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
ACL Performance Measure | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met | Met | Met | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 13,217 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 3,351 |
Representatives of Education | 397 |
Representatives of Employment | 112 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 57 |
Representatives of Community Living | 287 |
Representatives of Technology | 7,539 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 |
TOTAL | 24,960 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
14,761 | 10,199 | 00 | 24,960 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 11,431 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 4,320 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 7,539 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 839 |
Transition | 831 |
Total | 24,960 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
In 2017, TFL hosted the AT Lab at the Health Communities Conference with the Georgia Division of Aging Services. All of the 415 participants participated AT-related sessions. We are planning to host the AT Lab again in 2018 for this successful conference.
Breifly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
In 2017, TFL co-hosted the Institute Design for Educating All Students (IDEAS) with the Georgia Department of Education. All of the 812 participants participated AT and Transition sessions. This successful conference continues to grow and we are planning to co-host it again in 2018.
Breifly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
In 2017, TFL continued and updated GT | AMAC's Massive Open Online Course through EdX focused on Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Accessibility. TFL created the successful module 3 focused on AT and ICT Accessibility. Currently, we have 7,539 students enrolled. Students learned how to identify issues and design solutions for information and communication technology (ICT) accessibility for customers and employees with disabilities. Our ICT Accessibility MOOC one of the top 20 high-performing self-paced courses on edX.org.
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 3,813 |
Training or Technique Assistance will be developed or implemented | 3,726 |
No known outcome at this time | 00 |
Nonrespondent | 00 |
Total | 7,539 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 100% |
RSA Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met |
Education | 23% |
---|---|
Employment | 22% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 14% |
Representative of Community Living | 25% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 16% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
TFL worked with the Georgia Vocational Rehabilitation Agency (GVRA) to develop an AT Lab and connect with AT vendors for the Roosevelt Warm Springs Institute in Rehabilitation to serve individuals with disabilities on campus and in west Georgia.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
TFL continues to provide TA to Division of Aging Services to develop AT policies, practices and an algorithm to assist individuals to successfully transition out of nursing homes.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. On December 13, 2016, the Tools for Life team provided a training on Disability Awareness and Assistive Technology 101 for 28 employment specialists working with the Disability Employment Initiative (DEI) grant. This training explored AT solutions in the workplace, people first language and communication etiquette when working with individuals living with disabilities and assisting them with employment transition.
2. Tools for Life facilitated and co-hosted the Keystone Librarians Automated Services (KLAS) annual conference on March 23-24, 2017 at Georgia Tech. This conference was attended by 76 participants that included library managers and key staff from all over the country. The training provided by Tools for Life team members focused on assistive technology and accessible materials. Conference participants left with a better knowledge of how to raise awareness on technologies that enable individuals with disabilities to access library materials.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 1,011 | 1,201 | 2,212 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 831 | 786 | 1,617 |
Representative of Education | 923 | 256 | 1,179 |
Representative of Employment | 97 | 26 | 123 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 78 | 82 | 160 |
Representative of Community Living | 233 | 991 | 1,224 |
Representative of Technology | 89 | 45 | 134 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 3,262 | 3,387 | 6,649 |
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 01 |
---|
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
The State ADAs Office, Georgia Tech AMAC Accessibility Research Center and TFL who form AccessGA worked together to assist the Georgia Department of Corrections to become accessible with their website and apps.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
AccessGA, Georgia's Accessible ICT Initiative, is a joint initiative of the State of Georgia ADA Coordinator's Office and AMAC Accessibility Solutions and Research Center and Tools for Life at the Georgia Institute of Technology, with additional support from georgia.gov. Its design and purpose is to support Georgia state agencies with Information and Communication Technology (ICT) accessibility, promoting equal and timely access for employees and customers with a wide range of disabilities. In 2017, AccessGA assisted 10 agencies significantly with TA in their policies and practices to implement ICT accessibility. http://accessga.org/
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Technology (ICT accessibility and AT
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? | No |
---|
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds |
---|---|---|
State Appropriations | $31,500 | Demonstration |
Public/State Agency | $100,000 | Technical Assistance |
Public/State Agency | $500,000 | Demonstration |
Public/State Agency | $491,000 | Training |
State Appropriations | $31,500 | Reuse |
State Appropriations | $31,500 | Device Loan |
Private | $50,000 | Reuse |
Public/State Agency | $38,000 | Technical Assistance |
Federal | $14,000 | Training |
Public/State Agency | $100,000 | Demonstration |
Federal | $10,000 | Technical Assistance |
Federal | $76,400 | Training |
State Appropriations | $31,500 | State Financing |
Amount: $1,505,400 |
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Individuals Served | Other Outcome |
---|
Association of Assistive Technology Act Programs . Saved: Fri May 04 2018 15:21:56 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time)