National Assistive Technology Act Data System

Annual Progress Report - Full Report

Arizona 2017

General Information

Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)

State AT Program Title:
Arizona Technology Access Program
State AT Program Title:
State AT Program URL
http://aztap.org
Mailing Address:
300 W. Clarendon Ave, Suite 475
City:
Phoenix
State:
Arizona
Zip Code:
85013
Program Email:
askaztap@nau.edu
Phone:
602-728-9534
TTY:
602-728-9535

Lead Agency

Agency Name:
Northern Arizona University - Institute for Human Development
Mailing Address:
Box 4130
City:
Flagstaff
State:
Arizona
Zip Code:
86011
Program URL:
www.nau.edu

Implementing Entity

Name of Implementing Agency:
Mailing Address:
City
State:
Zip Code:
Program URL:

Program Director and Other Contacts

Program Director for State AT Program (last, first):
Pleasant, Jill
Title:
Program Director
Phone:
602-728-9532
E-mail:
jill.pleasant@nau.edu
Program Director at Lead Agency (last, first):
Jill Pleasant
Title:
AzTAP Program Director
Phone:
602-728-9532
E-mail:
jill.pleasant@nau.edu
Primary Contact at Implementing Agency (last, first) - If applicable:
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director

Name (last, first):
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Certifying Representative

Name (last, first):
Byrd, Kerri
Title:
Director, Office of Sponsored Projects
Phone:
928-523-6466
E-mail:
kerri.byrd@nau.edu

State Financing

Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? Yes
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? Yes

Loan Applications
Area of Residence Total
Metro
RUCC 1-3
Non-Metro
RUCC 4-9
Approved Loan made 22 00 22
Approved Not made 01 00 01
Rejected 07 00 07
Total 30 00 30

2. Income of Applicants to Whom Loans Were Made

Lowest/Highest Incomes
Lowest Income: $8,820 Highest Income: $131,280

Average Income
Sum of Incomes Loans Made Average Annual Income
$1,123,757 22 $51,080

Number and Percentage of Loans Made to Applicants by Income Range
Income Ranges Total
$15,000
or Less
$15,001-
$30,000
$30,001-
$45,000
$45,001-
$60,000
$60,001-
$75,000
$75,001
or More
Number of Loans 05 02 04 03 03 05 22
Percentage of Loans 22.73% 9.09% 18.18% 13.64% 13.64% 22.73% 100%

3. Loan Type

Loan Type
Type of Loan Number of Loans Percentage of loans
Revolving Loans 00 0%
Partnership Loans 0%
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee 00 0%
With interest buy-down only 00 100%
With loan guarantee only 22 0%
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee 00 0%
Total 22 100%

Loan Type Summary
Type of Loan Number of Loans Dollar Value of Loans
Revolving Loans 00 $0
Partnership Loans 22 $82,402
Total 22 $82,402

4. Interest Rates

Interest Rates
Lowest 4.5%
Highest 4.5%

Interest Rate Summary
Sum of Interest Rates Number of Loans Made Average Interest Rate
99 22 4.5%

Number of Loans Made by Interest Rate
Interest Rate Number of loans
0.0% to 2.0% 00
2.1% to 4.0% 00
4.1% to 6.0% 22
6.1% to 8.0% 00
8.1% - 10.0% 00
10.1%-12.0% 00
12.1%-14.0% 00
14.1% + 00
Total 22

5. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed

Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed
Type of AT Number of Devices Financed Dollar Value of Loans
Vision 05 $14,914
Hearing 12 $25,221
Speech communication 00 $0
Learning, cognition, and developmental 00 $0
Mobility, seating and positioning 07 $19,327
Daily living 00 $0
Environmental adaptations 01 $5,990
Vehicle modification and transportation 03 $13,826
Computers and related 06 $3,124
Recreation, sports, and leisure 00 $0
Total 34 $82,402

6. Defaults

Defaults
Number Loans in default 03
Net loss for loans in default $8,826

B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? 00


C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? 01
Activity 1
How would you describe this state financing activity?
2. Geographic Distribution and Number of Individuals Served
Geographic Distribution
County of Residence Individuals Served
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) 16
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) 01
C. Total Served 17

Performance Measure Number
Performance Measure Number
D. Excluded from Performance Measure 00
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 17

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded
Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded
Type of AT Device / Service Number Provided Total Estimated
Current Retail
Purchase Price
Total Price for
Which Devices
Were Sold
Savings
to Consumers
Vision 00 $0 $0 $0
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech communication 00 $0 $0 $0
Learning, cognition, and developmental 00 $0 $0 $0
Mobility, seating and positioning 00 $0 $0 $0
Daily living 00 $0 $0 $0
Environmental adaptations 00 $0 $0 $0
Vehicle modification and transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and related 17 $3,587 $2,737 $850
Recreation, sports, and leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 17 $3,587 $2,737 $850

D. Anecdote

Cate, a young woman who is legally blind and on the autism spectrum applied for a financial loan from Arizona Loan$ for Assistive Technology (AzLAT) to purchase a new Braille note taking device. She had previously received an older model through our AT Device Exchange program, but wanted one with newer features. Despite a $9,060 annual income and no credit history, the Loan Review Committee approved her application based on absence of other debt and sufficient monthly income to repay the loan. AzLAT staff worked with Cate to obtain a promotional discount on the new device along with a trade-in deal on her older unit. This lowered the purchase price by 30% to $4371, making the monthly payments of $130 for three years very affordable to her. Cate is thrilled to have her new device which she uses for downloading books, Internet searches and accessing email.

Impact Area

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 01 04 16 21
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 01 01 16 18
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 02 05 32 39
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 02 05 32 39
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 02 05 32 39
9. Performance on this measure 100% 100% 100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 37 94.87%
Satisfied 02 5.13%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 39
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Reutilization

A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices

Activity Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity
A. Device Exchange 93
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan 20
C. Total 113

Performance Measure
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure 00
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients 00
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 113

If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

B. Device Exchange Activities

Device Exchange
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Exchanged Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged Savings to Consumers
Vision 04 $7,547 $500 $7,047
Hearing 07 $864 $0 $864
Speech Communication 34 $169,333 $0 $169,333
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 02 $84 $0 $84
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 03 $1,670 $400 $1,270
Daily Living 04 $5,435 $450 $4,985
Environmental Adaptations 13 $3,394 $400 $2,994
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 01 $57,922 $25,500 $32,422
Computers and Related 25 $7,322 $0 $7,322
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 93 $253,571 $27,250 $226,321

C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities

Device Reassign/Repair/Refurbish and/or OEL
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold Savings to Consumers
Vision 01 $995 $0 $995
Hearing 14 $867 $0 $867
Speech Communication 09 $67,485 $0 $67,485
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 00 $0 $0 $0
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 00 $0 $0 $0
Daily Living 01 $10,000 $0 $10,000
Environmental Adaptations 23 $5,714 $0 $5,714
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 07 $2,208 $0 $2,208
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 55 $87,269 $0 $87,269

D. Anecdote

AzTAP received a call from a woman whose husband was living in an adult care facility. She wanted to bring him home, but needed an electric lift device that would help him stand in order to safely get from the bed to a chair and to the toilet. Because she did not have a computer, AzTAP staff searched our AT Exchange postings, found several possible choices and guided her through the selection process and helped her connect with the seller. As a result, the family purchased an affordable lift that met their needs for $450, saving $3661 over the retail cost of a new device.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 14 00 06 20
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 18 04 54 76
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 02 02
4. Subtotal 32 04 62 98
5. None of the above 01 00 02 03
6. Subtotal 33 04 64 101
7. Nonrespondent 05 01 06 12
8. Total 38 05 70 113
9. Performance on this measure 84.21% 80% 88.57%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 113 100%
Satisfied 00 0%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 113
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Device Loan

A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose

Loans By Purpose
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan Number
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) 739
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding 80
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation 72
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity 156
Total 1,047

B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower

Loans By Borrower Type
Type of Individual or Entity Number of Device Borrowers
Individuals with Disabilities 470
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 07
Representative of Education 460
Representative of Employment 00
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 52
Representatives of Community Living 20
Representatives of Technology 38
Total 1,047

C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans

Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days 14

D. Types of Devices Loaned

Types of Devices Loaned
Type of AT Device Number
Vision 270
Hearing 260
Speech Communication 384
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 1,027
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 109
Daily Living 496
Environmental Adaptations 467
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 01
Computers and Related 885
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 265
Total 4,164

E. Anecdote

Avery is a high school senior with limited use of his arms and hands. To improve his ability to access the computer, Avery’s teacher borrowed a wireless, alternative mouse from a device loan program that AzTAP operates for the Arizona Department of Education. The device works like a regular mouse, except that head, rather than hand movements control the mouse pointer. For Avery, the impact of this loan was profound: “The HeadMouse has changed my life in many ways. Before, I couldn’t use the computer to play games because of my hands. This has also made me feel more independent when doing schoolwork rather than having someone doing it for me. Before I had this new type of mouse, I was pretty much bored all the time because all I could do was watch TV. Now I have the freedom to play games and feel independent in school. My mom is also so happy that there is something that makes me more independent.”

Impact Area

F. Access Performance Measures

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 230 28 176 434
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 83 09 53 145
Subtotal 313 37 229 579
Have not made a decision 77 01 18 96
Subtotal 390 38 247 675
Nonrespondent 35 03 26 64
Total 425 41 273 739
Performance on this measure 75.83% 92.62% 86.78%

G. Acquisition Performance Measures

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 26 01 01 28
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 136 25 78 239
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 01 00 00 01
4. Subtotal 163 26 79 268
5. None of the above 06 00 09 15
6. Subtotal 169 26 88 283
7. Nonrespondent 10 01 14 25
8. Total 179 27 102 308
9. Performance on this measure 92.88% 97.56% 81.36%

H. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 890 85%
Satisfied 67 6.4%
Satisfied somewhat 05 0.48%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 85 8.12%
Total Surveyed 1,047
Response rate % 91.88%

I. Notes:

Loan period for schools is 28 days.

Device Demonstration

A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type

Demonstrations by Device Type
Type of AT Device / Service Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services
Vision 18
Hearing 19
Speech Communication 205
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 10
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 04
Daily Living 27
Environmental Adaptations 21
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00
Computers and Related 38
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00
Total # of Devices Loaned 342

B. Types of Participants

Demonstrations by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations
Individuals with Disabilities 334
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 364
Representatives of Education 58
Representatives of Employment 02
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 126
Representative of Community Living 15
Representative of Technology 10
Total 909

C. Number of Referrals

Referrals
Type of Entity Number of Referrals
Funding Source (non-AT program) 23
Service Provider 22
Vendor 134
Repair Service 00
Others 00
Total 179

D. Anecdote

Joe was an attorney for a federal agency and traveled frequently to Washington DC from his home in Arizona Side effects of radiation treatments for a tumor resulted in right sided paralysis, difficulty with fine motor coordination, soft voice and the need to get around using a wheelchair. He was hoping to keep his job, and contacted AzTAP to learn what types of assistive technology were available to help him continue using his computer. During the demonstration, he and the AzTAP assistive technology specialist discussed his needs and she recommended he consider voice recognition software to replace the keyboard and different mouse options he use with his left hand. Microphones paired with the speech recognition software were also tried to see which one was most sensitive to his soft voice. After the demonstration, Joe borrowed the items for two weeks and decided to buy the speech recognition software and the microphone that offered a volume control feature. Although he decided to retire from his job, Joe reported that the assistive technology allows him to easily create and respond to his personal emails - which he is very pleased about!

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 17 24 261 302
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 02 01 20 23
Subtotal 19 25 281 325
Have not made a decision 01 01 07 09
Subtotal 20 26 288 334
Nonrespondent 00 00 08 08
Total 20 26 296 342
Performance on this measure 95% 96.15% 94.93%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 877 96.48%
Satisfied 28 3.08%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 04 0.44%
Total 909
Response rate % 99.56%

G. Notes:

Overall Performance Measures

Overall Acquisition Performance Measure

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 41 05 23 69
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 155 30 148 333
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 01 00 02 03
4. Subtotal 197 35 173 405
5. None of the above 07 00 11 18
6. Subtotal 204 35 184 423
7. Nonrespondent 15 02 20 37
8. Total 219 37 204 460
9. Performance on this measure 89.95% 94.59% 84.8% 88.04%
ACL Performance Measure 75% 75% 75% 75%
Met/Not Met Met Met Met Met

Overall Access Performance Measure

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 247 52 437 736
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 85 10 73 168
Subtotal 332 62 510 904
Have not made a decision 78 02 25 105
Subtotal 410 64 535 1,009
Nonrespondent 35 03 34 72
Total 445 67 569 1,081
Performance on this measure 74.61% 92.54% 89.63% 83.63%
ACL Performance Measure 70% 70% 70% 70%
Met/Not Met Not Met Met Met Met

Training

A. Training Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution

Training by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number
Individuals with Disabilities 188
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 109
Representatives of Education 834
Representatives of Employment 231
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 1,076
Representatives of Community Living 389
Representatives of Technology 243
Unable to Categorize 00
TOTAL 3,070

Geographic Distribution of Participants
Metro Non Metro Unknown TOTAL
2,721 349 00 3,070

B. Training Topics

Trainings by Topic
Primary Topic of Training Participants
AT Products/Services 2,401
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice 13
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access 21
Combination of any/all of the above 405
Transition 230
Total 3,070

B. Description of Training Activities

Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:

AzTAP sponsored two in-depth pre-conference workshops as part of its annual conference. 30 Individuals (mostly OTs, PTs and SLPs) attended Access or Activations: Rethinking the Approach for Access and Mobility. The workshop content focused on effective strategies for functional seating and mobility and why some strategies are ineffective for functional movement and independence. 40 persons including educators, school-based therapists and VR Counselors attended Apps & AT Across the Curriculum: Supporting Diverse Learners in a UDL Environment with Google and iOS to learn how to Identify and explore and implement technologies that support learning in a UDL environment and provide access to AEM (Accessible Educational Materials) including digital textbooks and worksheets.

Breifly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

As part of a private school summer camp program for students with Learning Disabilities, Attention Deficit Disorders, Autism Spectrum Disorders and similar conditions, AzTAP was asked to provide an Assistive Technology (AT) Lab experience for 21 students who were transitioning to college. The students spent several hours in the AT Center with hands on access to AT devices and gained knowledge about assistive technology in the categories of reading, writing, sensory modulation, executive function, hearing, vision, computer access and augmentative and alternative communication. The students were very engaged and reported that they valued this experience. The camp counselor and its participants sent our program individualized notes describing how they benefited from the experience. As one student said :It sowed me The notes indicated that students believed the information would help them get through school and work easier in the future, as well as understand how assistive technology helps others with a variety of disabilities.

Breifly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:

AzTAP promoted the availability of ATAP ICT webinars and encouraged registration by use of periodic email blasts, newsletter and information posted on the training section of our website. It was strongly recommended to all of our conference speakers that they ensure accessibility of their presentations by participating in one of the document accessibility presentations and several did.

D. IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure

IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received Number
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies 03
Training or Technique Assistance will be developed or implemented 02
No known outcome at this time 11
Nonrespondent 05
Total 21
Performance Measure Percentage 23.8%
RSA Target Percentage 70%
Met/Not Met Not Met

E. Notes:

We have reviewed and revised internal tracking procedures to better obtain outcome data from ICT training participants

Technical Assistance

A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance

Technical Assistance by Recipient Type
Education 0%
Employment 21.27%
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 0%
Representative of Community Living 78.73%
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) 0%
Total 100%

B. Description of Technical Assistance

Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:

A nonprofit sports association wanted to expand their adaptive sports program in northern Arizona by applying for a federal adaptive recreation grant through the Veteran's Affairs Department. AzTAP staff provided technical assistance regarding development of the grant proposal that addressed purchase and management of assistive technologies for adaptive skiing and snowboarding and training of adaptive ski instructors knowledgeable in the use and implementation of these assistive technologies.

Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

Last Spring, the AzTAP Program Director met with representative from the Arizona Developmental Disabilities Planning Council and Employment First to explore strategies for strengthening a collaboration among our organizations to ensure Employment First Initiatives address assistive technology issues for high school students with disabilities as part of the transition process as they exit school and move towards post-secondary education, employment and independent living. Subsequently the director regularly attends monthly Employment First meetings to provide input and recommendations.

C. Notes:

Public Awareness

Public Awareness Narratives

Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.

1. AzTAP annually hosts an annual state wide assistive technology conference. The 2017 multi-strand conference was a partnership between AzTAP and its parent organization, the Institute for Human Development. In addition to more than 50 assistive technology sessions, program content included Evidenced Based Practice and Native American Tribal Vocational Rehabilitation. 567 persons attended the 2.5 day conference; the Exhibit Hall had 55 AT vendors and was open at no cost to the general population for a full afternoon and early evening so that consumers and family members could learn about a wide range of assistive technology devices and services. Participants included educators, therapists, Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) Counselors, Tribal VR counselors from many Tribal entities across the US, Developmental Disability service providers and consumers and family members. Feedback was overall highly positive as reflected in the following comments extracted from the conference evaluations: “Keeps getting better every year! Great job!” “One of the best conferences I’ve ever attended.” “Very organized, excellent staff, great closing speaker.” “The presenters for all the sessions that I attended were outstanding. Thank you!!!”“The closing session was wonderful, what a way to close the conference. I am impressed.”

Information And Assistance

Information And Assistance Activities by Recipient
Types of Recipients AT Device/
Service
AT Funding Total
Individuals with Disabilities 421 107 528
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 303 26 329
Representative of Education 178 03 181
Representative of Employment 26 00 26
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 236 09 245
Representative of Community Living 144 10 154
Representative of Technology 22 10 32
Unable to Categorize 00 00 00
Total 1,330 165 1,495

Notes:

State Improvement Outcomes

State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 00

A. State Improvements

1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.


2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)


3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?


B. State Improvements

1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.


2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)


3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?

Additional And Leveraged Funds

Additional and Leveraged Funds

Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? Yes

A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities

State Plan Activities
Fund Source Amount Use of Funds
Public/State Agency$157,383Device Loan
Private$5,000Demonstration
Public/State Agency$250,000Demonstration
Private$74,925Device Loan
Public/State Agency$10,000Training
Private$5,000Device Loan
Amount: $502,308

B. Leveraged Funding for Activities Not in State Plan (data not previously reported in other activity sections)

Non-State Plan Activities
Fund Source Amount Use of Funds Individuals Served Other Outcome

C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).

Back to state program information page | Top of page

This FY17 State AT Program Annual Progress Report was exported from the National Assistive Technology Act Data System (NATADS). NATADS was developed with partial support from the Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance.


Association of Assistive Technology Act Programs . Saved: Fri May 04 2018 15:20:06 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time)