National Assistive Technology Act Data System

Annual Progress Report - Full Report

Massachusetts 2017

General Information

Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)

State AT Program Title:
Massachusetts Maximizing Assistive Technology in Consumers' Hands (MassMATCH)
State AT Program Title:
State AT Program URL
www.massmatch.org
Mailing Address:
600 Washington Street
City:
Boston
State:
MA
Zip Code:
02111
Program Email:
info@massmatch.org
Phone:
877-508-3974
TTY:
617-204-3815

Lead Agency

Agency Name:
Massachusetts Rehabilitation Commission
Mailing Address:
600 Washington Street
City:
Boston
State:
MA
Zip Code:
02111
Program URL:
www.mass.gov/orgs/massachusetts-rehabilitation-commission

Implementing Entity

Name of Implementing Agency:
Mailing Address:
City
State:
Zip Code:
Program URL:

Program Director and Other Contacts

Program Director for State AT Program (last, first):
Shor, Ann
Title:
Director, Independent Living/Assistive Technology
Phone:
617-204-3602
E-mail:
ann.shor@massmail.state.ma.us
Program Director at Lead Agency (last, first):
Bonney, Kobena
Title:
MassMATCH Program Coordinator
Phone:
617-204-3826
E-mail:
kobena.bonney@massmail.state.ma.us
Primary Contact at Implementing Agency (last, first) - If applicable:
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director

Name (last, first):
Bonney, Kobena
Title:
MassMATCH Program Coordinator
Phone:
617-204-3826
E-mail:
kobena.bonney@massmail.state.ma.us

Certifying Representative

Name (last, first):
Wolf, Toni
Title:
Commissioner
Phone:
617-204-3600
E-mail:
toni.wolf@massmail.state.ma.us

State Financing

Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? Yes
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? Yes

Loan Applications
Area of Residence Total
Metro
RUCC 1-3
Non-Metro
RUCC 4-9
Approved Loan made 26 00 26
Approved Not made 00 00 00
Rejected 21 00 21
Total 47 00 47

2. Income of Applicants to Whom Loans Were Made

Lowest/Highest Incomes
Lowest Income: $9,960 Highest Income: $70,000

Average Income
Sum of Incomes Loans Made Average Annual Income
$1,209,491 26 $46,519

Number and Percentage of Loans Made to Applicants by Income Range
Income Ranges Total
$15,000
or Less
$15,001-
$30,000
$30,001-
$45,000
$45,001-
$60,000
$60,001-
$75,000
$75,001
or More
Number of Loans 15 07 01 02 01 00 26
Percentage of Loans 57.69% 26.92% 3.85% 7.69% 3.85% 0% 100%

3. Loan Type

Loan Type
Type of Loan Number of Loans Percentage of loans
Revolving Loans 00 0%
Partnership Loans 0%
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee 00 65.3846153846154%
With interest buy-down only 17 0%
With loan guarantee only 00 34.6153846153846%
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee 09 0%
Total 26 100%

Loan Type Summary
Type of Loan Number of Loans Dollar Value of Loans
Revolving Loans 00 $0
Partnership Loans 26 $371,673
Total 26 $371,673

4. Interest Rates

Interest Rates
Lowest 3.75%
Highest 3.75%

Interest Rate Summary
Sum of Interest Rates Number of Loans Made Average Interest Rate
00 26 0%

Number of Loans Made by Interest Rate
Interest Rate Number of loans
0.0% to 2.0% 00
2.1% to 4.0% 26
4.1% to 6.0% 00
6.1% to 8.0% 00
8.1% - 10.0% 00
10.1%-12.0% 00
12.1%-14.0% 00
14.1% + 00
Total 26

5. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed

Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed
Type of AT Number of Devices Financed Dollar Value of Loans
Vision 00 $0
Hearing 07 $22,514
Speech communication 00 $0
Learning, cognition, and developmental 00 $0
Mobility, seating and positioning 00 $0
Daily living 00 $0
Environmental adaptations 00 $0
Vehicle modification and transportation 18 $348,659
Computers and related 01 $500
Recreation, sports, and leisure 00 $0
Total 26 $371,673

6. Defaults

Defaults
Number Loans in default 00
Net loss for loans in default $0

B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? 00


C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? 00

D. Anecdote

A local audiology center contacted the Massachusetts Assistive Technology Loan Program regarding their client, Cole, who had been trying unsuccessfully for years to obtain hearing aids. His limited earnings made it impossible. They were extremely concerned about Cole’s safety and that he was experiencing depression and feeling of isolation due to his worsening hearing. The center had helped him enroll in a managed care program and arranged for a large rebate from the manufacturer, but he was left with a balance of $1,000, which he was unable to pay or finance elsewhere. The MA AT Loan Program was able to facilitate the loan Cole needed to purchase the hearing aids. Afterwards, the audiologist reported that getting the loan buoyed his spirits and self-esteem and the hearing aids increased his quality of life tremendously.

Impact Area

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 00 01 18 19
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 04 04
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 00 01 22 23
5. None of the above 00 00 03 03
6. Subtotal 00 01 25 26
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 00 01 25 26
9. Performance on this measure NaN% 100% 88%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 23 88.46%
Satisfied 03 11.54%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 26
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Reutilization

A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices

Activity Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity
A. Device Exchange 12
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan 1,473
C. Total 1,485

Performance Measure
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure 00
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients 00
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 1,485

If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

B. Device Exchange Activities

Device Exchange
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Exchanged Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged Savings to Consumers
Vision 01 $3,995 $0 $3,995
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech Communication 00 $0 $0 $0
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 00 $0 $0 $0
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 07 $23,324 $600 $22,724
Daily Living 04 $2,884 $300 $2,584
Environmental Adaptations 00 $0 $0 $0
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 00 $0 $0 $0
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 12 $30,203 $900 $29,303

C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities

Device Reassign/Repair/Refurbish and/or OEL
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold Savings to Consumers
Vision 00 $0 $0 $0
Hearing 48 $14,180 $0 $14,180
Speech Communication 03 $1,281 $0 $1,281
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 02 $398 $0 $398
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 1,284 $1,575,162 $0 $1,575,162
Daily Living 116 $55,277 $0 $55,277
Environmental Adaptations 05 $1,386 $0 $1,386
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 15 $5,549 $0 $5,549
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 1,473 $1,653,233 $0 $1,653,233

D. Anecdote

The MassMATCH Long-term Device Loan Program was contacted by a local Senior Center on behalf of one of their members who greatly valued her independence. “Ann” was concerned that her ability to drive may be in jeopardy because as she aged, her already small stature was steadily diminishing, making it increasingly difficult to reach the gas and brake pedals in her car. In addition, putting the driver’s seat in the front most position caused her seat belt to fit improperly, creating a very unsafe situation for her. The LTDLP staff helped Ann fill out an application and was able to provide her with gas and brake pedal extenders, making driving a much safer and more comfortable experience. As a result, Ann is now more active in the community as she can now drive with no hesitation. The use of assistive technology has resulted in improved quality of life for Ann.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 43 15 635 693
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 39 00 50 89
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 73 05 220 298
4. Subtotal 155 20 905 1,080
5. None of the above 37 06 158 201
6. Subtotal 192 26 1,063 1,281
7. Nonrespondent 05 00 199 204
8. Total 197 26 1,262 1,485
9. Performance on this measure 78.68% 76.92% 71.71%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 440 29.63%
Satisfied 105 7.07%
Satisfied somewhat 31 2.09%
Not at all satisfied 01 0.07%
Nonrespondent 908 61.14%
Total Surveyed 1,485
Response rate % 38.86%

G. Notes:

Device Loan

A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose

Loans By Purpose
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan Number
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) 456
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding 40
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation 60
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity 57
Total 613

B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower

Loans By Borrower Type
Type of Individual or Entity Number of Device Borrowers
Individuals with Disabilities 176
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 193
Representative of Education 70
Representative of Employment 15
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 49
Representatives of Community Living 16
Representatives of Technology 94
Total 613

C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans

Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days 30

D. Types of Devices Loaned

Types of Devices Loaned
Type of AT Device Number
Vision 147
Hearing 81
Speech Communication 135
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 105
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 16
Daily Living 192
Environmental Adaptations 95
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00
Computers and Related 447
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 02
Total 1,220

E. Anecdote

Chris is a 56 year old man with cerebral palsy, total blindness and a minimal intellectual disability. He was first referred to the ATRC-Boston by the AT Director at the MA Assoc. for the Blind and Visually Impaired training program. “Chris wanted technology that felt comfortable to him, but also gave him the freedom of movement and control that he has never had before due to his circumstances.” After being introduced to the wide range of possible options available to him at the ATRC-Boston, Chris borrowed a laptop, but quickly discovered that it was not the right device for easy mobility. So the ATRC-Boston staff suggested he trial an iPad Pro with a keyboard instead. Once he met Siri on the iPad he began using his voice to control his technology. Chris discovered he could do many of the things he was having frustrations with in his daily life, like surfing the web and playing music. In addition, Chris’ motor coordination made it difficult for him to do things like plug in the power cord, or turn the volume up or down. The ATRC-Boston staff and Chris’ trainer worked together to find the right accessories and made the necessary adjustments. Once it was determined that the iPad was the way to go for Chris, the ATRC-Boston staff referred Chris’ Dept. of Developmental Services counselor to the MassMATCH Assistive Technology Loan Program to help obtain funding to purchase an iPad Pro for Chris. According to the counselor, “Chris’ CP, blindness and life circumstances like foster care placement resulted in severely limiting his life experiences.” Today, with the use of assistive technology, Chris’ life has changed dramatically for the better. He now has a job working as a DJ at a nursing home and hopes to someday work in radio.

Impact Area

F. Access Performance Measures

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 119 21 114 254
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 32 10 49 91
Subtotal 151 31 163 345
Have not made a decision 24 08 16 48
Subtotal 175 39 179 393
Nonrespondent 24 06 33 63
Total 199 45 212 456
Performance on this measure 79.22% 72.26% 81.32%

G. Acquisition Performance Measures

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 11 12 44 67
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 07 04 15 26
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 08 01 02 11
4. Subtotal 26 17 61 104
5. None of the above 08 06 15 29
6. Subtotal 34 23 76 133
7. Nonrespondent 08 01 15 24
8. Total 42 24 91 157
9. Performance on this measure 66.33% 71.88% 71.14%

H. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 442 72.1%
Satisfied 55 8.97%
Satisfied somewhat 09 1.47%
Not at all satisfied 06 0.98%
Nonrespondent 101 16.48%
Total Surveyed 613
Response rate % 83.52%

I. Notes:

Device Demonstration

A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type

Demonstrations by Device Type
Type of AT Device / Service Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services
Vision 30
Hearing 13
Speech Communication 33
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 20
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 11
Daily Living 13
Environmental Adaptations 15
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00
Computers and Related 38
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 02
Total # of Devices Loaned 175

B. Types of Participants

Demonstrations by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations
Individuals with Disabilities 85
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 45
Representatives of Education 23
Representatives of Employment 17
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 10
Representative of Community Living 21
Representative of Technology 07
Total 208

C. Number of Referrals

Referrals
Type of Entity Number of Referrals
Funding Source (non-AT program) 29
Service Provider 40
Vendor 29
Repair Service 13
Others 00
Total 111

D. Anecdote

Mary had been concerned with her seating and positioning, specially in bed at night. She came into the AT Regional Center in Pittsfield, MA to learn about the pressure mapping technology that had recently been added to the inventory. After the staff demonstrated the different types of PMT systems available for loan, how they work, etc., Mary decided to borrow a mattress-size pressure mapping system to use in her home. According to Mary, the results from her pressure mapping sessions over the period of the loan revealed no issues with her pressure points. As a result of the demonstration and subsequent device loan, Mary was able to obtain excellent information about her seating and positioning and as a result relieved that she is not doing damage to herself, especially in the way she sleeps.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 25 21 67 113
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 01 02 17 20
Subtotal 26 23 84 133
Have not made a decision 03 02 14 19
Subtotal 29 25 98 152
Nonrespondent 05 04 14 23
Total 34 29 112 175
Performance on this measure 76.47% 79.31% 75%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 143 68.75%
Satisfied 33 15.87%
Satisfied somewhat 12 5.77%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 20 9.62%
Total 208
Response rate % 90.38%

G. Notes:

Overall Performance Measures

Overall Acquisition Performance Measure

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 54 28 697 779
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 46 04 69 119
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 81 06 222 309
4. Subtotal 181 38 988 1,207
5. None of the above 45 12 176 233
6. Subtotal 226 50 1,164 1,440
7. Nonrespondent 13 01 214 228
8. Total 239 51 1,378 1,668
9. Performance on this measure 75.73% 74.51% 71.7% 72.36%
ACL Performance Measure 75% 75% 75% 75%
Met/Not Met Met Not Met Not Met Not Met

Overall Access Performance Measure

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 144 42 181 367
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 33 12 66 111
Subtotal 177 54 247 478
Have not made a decision 27 10 30 67
Subtotal 204 64 277 545
Nonrespondent 29 10 47 86
Total 233 74 324 631
Performance on this measure 75.97% 72.97% 76.23% 75.75%
ACL Performance Measure 70% 70% 70% 70%
Met/Not Met Met Not Met Met Met

Training

A. Training Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution

Training by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number
Individuals with Disabilities 63
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 11
Representatives of Education 78
Representatives of Employment 04
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 95
Representatives of Community Living 174
Representatives of Technology 06
Unable to Categorize 00
TOTAL 431

Geographic Distribution of Participants
Metro Non Metro Unknown TOTAL
431 00 00 431

B. Training Topics

Trainings by Topic
Primary Topic of Training Participants
AT Products/Services 62
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice 13
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access 12
Combination of any/all of the above 188
Transition 156
Total 431

B. Description of Training Activities

Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:

During FY17, MassMATCH was awarded a 2016 High Impact Innovative Technology Assistance Grant from the Dana and Christopher Reeves Foundation to carry out the Weight and Seating Independence Project (WSIP). The goals & objectives of the project are to improve the independence, autonomy and control of health and wellness by persons with SCI in central and western Massachusetts. The primary objective is to enable knowledge and use of digital pressure mapping technology and wheelchair accessible scales in the least restrictive environment. To improve access to wheelchair accessible scales, MassMATCH has provided roll-on scales for use by wheelchair users at the four Independent Living Center sites (ILCs) serving Central and Western Massachusetts. The scales are durable and large enough to accommodate most power and manual wheelchairs, including those with a bariatric wheelbase. MassMATCH has also equipped two of our AT Regional Center (ATRC) locations in Pittsfield and Worcester with portable wheelchair accessible scales for both demonstrations and short-term loans. To improve access to digital pressure mapping technology, MassMATCH acquired a variety of PMT systems (pediatric,mattress, bariatric, and adult digital pressure mapping systems) for demonstration and short-term loan to individuals. The ATRCs at both UCP Berkshire and Easter Seals MA have become demonstration sites for digital pressure mapping technology. The most innovative feature of WSIP is the series of 4 PMT trainings conducted to build and improve the region’s knowledge of and capacity with these mapping systems (and encourage seating and positioning troubleshooting). The four-hour trainings were provided by veterans of wheelchair seating and positioning, under the leadership of Mary Jo Wagner of the Mass. Dept. of Developmental Services (DDS), who frequently uses pressure mapping technology in her work. Trainees learned about pressure injuries, their stages, causes and risks and how to prevent them, including positioning for sitting and sleeping. They also learned how digital pressure mapping can be used to understand the unique needs of individual wheelchair users. The PMT trainings were targeted at ATRC staff ,health care service networks serving persons with paralysis in their homes and/or outpatient settings; 43 individuals attended the PMT trainings. ATRC staff attended the trainings and have started using the knowledge acquired to provide demonstrations for wheelchair users, family members/caregivers and area professionals interested in borrowing the equipment during and beyond the grant-funded period. 100% of participants were highly satisfied with the trainings and indicated that they would highly recommend them to others.

Breifly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

During FY17, MassMATCH staff collaborated with our partners at the MA Executive Office of Elder Affairs (EOEA) to develop and host a series of 12 assistive technology trainings across the state. 10 of them were considered Basic while 2 were classified as Advanced. The Basic training introduced the concept of assistive technology, types of devices available and how they are used, and shared information about AT resources in the state. The Advanced training provided a more detailed exploration of the use of AT, using the Transition Assistance to Community Living Environment (TACLE) assessment tool. This simple tool, developed under MassMATCH, helps consumers and professionals identify areas of independent living in which the consumer may benefit from the use of assistive technology, and help them identify specific devices and resources to acquire the needed AT. 58 individuals attended the trainings, including transition coordinators, waiver case managers, housing transition entities, options counselors and other staff from the 'No Wrong Door' system who assist individuals with disabilities or elders in transitioning to the community and living more independently. There were also staff from other Aging and Disability Resource Consortia Community Partners such as Adult Family Care, Veterans Service Officers, Supported Living Providers, Housing Authorities, Councils on Aging, Home care providers, Community Health Care workers, SHINE staff and others.

Breifly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:

Due to its limited in-house capacity, MassMATCH is collaborating with one of our partner agencies to develop a series of in-person trainings that will address a variety of topics dealing with the accessibility of information and communication technology (ICT). These trainings will be offered in spring/summer 2018, and the resulting data reported as part of the FY18 Annual Progress Report.

D. IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure

IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received Number
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies 00
Training or Technique Assistance will be developed or implemented 01
No known outcome at this time 04
Nonrespondent 07
Total 12
Performance Measure Percentage 8.3%
RSA Target Percentage 70%
Met/Not Met Not Met

E. Notes:

Technical Assistance

A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance

Technical Assistance by Recipient Type
Education 0%
Employment 0%
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 34.6%
Representative of Community Living 46.2%
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) 19.2%
Total 100%

B. Description of Technical Assistance

Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:

As stated elsewhere, during FY17, MassMATCH was awarded a 2016 High Impact Innovative Technology Assistance Grant from the Dana and Christopher Reeves Foundation to carry out the Weight and Seating Independence Project (WSIP). The goals of the project are to improve the independence, autonomy and control of health and wellness by persons with SCI in central and western Massachusetts. The primary objective is to enable knowledge and use of digital pressure mapping technology and wheelchair accessible scales in the least restrictive environment. As the digital pressure mapping technology is targeted at the general public - wheelchair users, family members/caregivers, service networks serving persons with paralysis in their homes and/or outpatient settings - MassMATCH staff strongly believed that creating a user manual for the PMTs is critical. Consequently, we provided technical assistance to MA DDS to produce a user-friendly how-to protocol for use and distribution with the PMT system

Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

During FY17, MassMATCH staff provided technical assistance to three Independent Living Centers in Central and Western Massachusetts in connection with the Weight and Seating Independence Project. MassMATCH staff helped determine the most suitable conditions to ensure the smooth operation of the wheelchair accessible platform scales at their respective locations in Worcester, Springfield, Amherst, and Pittsfield, MA. MassMATCH staff provided advice on issues to consider such as the amount of space needed, the positioning and installation of the platform scales, the mounting of the displays, etc. As a result of the TA provided, all four platform scales are fully operational and serving the needs of people with SCI in Central and Western Massachusetts. The availability of the scales is making it easier for persons with disabilities who need to transition from institutional living into the community to do so, knowing that they can now easily weigh themselves at any of the participating I

C. Notes:

Public Awareness

Public Awareness Narratives

Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.

1. In FY17, in addition to our usual public awareness activities, we embarked on a set of targeted public AT presentations/demonstrations in connection with a new grant award we received from the Dana and Christopher Reeves Foundation. The award is funding our Weight and Seating Independence Project (WSIP), which aims to improve the independence, autonomy and control of health and wellness by persons with SCI in central and western Massachusetts by increasing awareness of and providing access to digital pressure mapping technology and wheelchair accessible scales in the least restrictive environment. To publicize the launch of the project and availability of the scales and PMT system, we carried out a multi-faceted outreach campaign involving electronic and printed flyers, Facebook/blog postings, newsletter and email articles, etc. We also brought examples of both items to some of the larger events we attend, such as the 3-day Abilities Expo, the annual Human Service Providers Conference, and the annual statewide ADA celebration hosted by the Statewide Independent Living Council. At each event, MassMATCH staff gave brief presentations about MassMATCH and the Weight and Seating Independence Project and demonstrated both the PMT and the wheelchair accessible scale. The presentations/demonstrations were very successful as they provided participants with valuable information about available AT resources in the state as well as concrete evidence of the impact of AT. Between the 6 presentation/demonstration events, about 148 people with disabilities tried out the PMT and portable accessible scales first-hand. Overall, these outreach activities reached approximately 2,345 people and contributed a great deal towards the public’s understanding of what is AT and where they can find or learn more about AT in Massachusetts.

Information And Assistance

Information And Assistance Activities by Recipient
Types of Recipients AT Device/
Service
AT Funding Total
Individuals with Disabilities 814 1,052 1,866
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 886 170 1,056
Representative of Education 62 545 607
Representative of Employment 71 453 524
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 337 779 1,116
Representative of Community Living 90 121 211
Representative of Technology 10 10 20
Unable to Categorize 425 243 668
Total 2,695 3,373 6,068

Notes:

State Improvement Outcomes

State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 00

A. State Improvements

1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.


2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)


3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?


B. State Improvements

1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.


2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)


3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?

Additional And Leveraged Funds

Additional and Leveraged Funds

Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? Yes

A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities

State Plan Activities
Fund Source Amount Use of Funds
State Appropriations$34,000State Financing
State Appropriations$392,265Reuse
Public/State Agency$35,000Reuse
Private$74,878Device Loan
State Appropriations$59,200Device Loan
Amount: $595,343

B. Leveraged Funding for Activities Not in State Plan (data not previously reported in other activity sections)

Non-State Plan Activities
Fund Source Amount Use of Funds Individuals Served Other Outcome

C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).

Back to state program information page | Top of page

This FY17 State AT Program Annual Progress Report was exported from the National Assistive Technology Act Data System (NATADS). NATADS was developed with partial support from the Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance.


Association of Assistive Technology Act Programs . Saved: Fri May 04 2018 15:25:20 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time)