Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
Area of Residence | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
Approved Loan made | 26 | 00 | 26 |
Approved Not made | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Rejected | 21 | 00 | 21 |
Total | 47 | 00 | 47 |
Lowest Income: | $9,960 | Highest Income: | $70,000 |
---|
Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
---|---|---|
$1,209,491 | 26 | $46,519 |
Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
Number of Loans | 15 | 07 | 01 | 02 | 01 | 00 | 26 |
Percentage of Loans | 57.69% | 26.92% | 3.85% | 7.69% | 3.85% | 0% | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 00 | 0% |
Partnership Loans | 0% | |
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 65.3846153846154% |
With interest buy-down only | 17 | 0% |
With loan guarantee only | 00 | 34.6153846153846% |
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 09 | 0% |
Total | 26 | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 00 | $0 |
Partnership Loans | 26 | $371,673 |
Total | 26 | $371,673 |
Lowest | 3.75% |
---|---|
Highest | 3.75% |
Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
---|---|---|
00 | 26 | 0% |
Interest Rate | Number of loans |
---|---|
0.0% to 2.0% | 00 |
2.1% to 4.0% | 26 |
4.1% to 6.0% | 00 |
6.1% to 8.0% | 00 |
8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
14.1% + | 00 |
Total | 26 |
Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 |
Hearing | 07 | $22,514 |
Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 00 | $0 |
Daily living | 00 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 00 | $0 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 18 | $348,659 |
Computers and related | 01 | $500 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
Total | 26 | $371,673 |
Number Loans in default | 00 |
---|---|
Net loss for loans in default | $0 |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 00 |
---|
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 00 |
---|
A local audiology center contacted the Massachusetts Assistive Technology Loan Program regarding their client, Cole, who had been trying unsuccessfully for years to obtain hearing aids. His limited earnings made it impossible. They were extremely concerned about Cole’s safety and that he was experiencing depression and feeling of isolation due to his worsening hearing. The center had helped him enroll in a managed care program and arranged for a large rebate from the manufacturer, but he was left with a balance of $1,000, which he was unable to pay or finance elsewhere. The MA AT Loan Program was able to facilitate the loan Cole needed to purchase the hearing aids. Afterwards, the audiologist reported that getting the loan buoyed his spirits and self-esteem and the hearing aids increased his quality of life tremendously.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 01 | 18 | 19 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 04 | 04 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 00 | 01 | 22 | 23 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 03 | 03 |
6. Subtotal | 00 | 01 | 25 | 26 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 00 | 01 | 25 | 26 |
9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | 100% | 88% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 23 | 88.46% |
Satisfied | 03 | 11.54% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 26 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 12 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 1,473 |
C. Total | 1,485 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients | 00 |
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 1,485 |
If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 01 | $3,995 | $0 | $3,995 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 07 | $23,324 | $600 | $22,724 |
Daily Living | 04 | $2,884 | $300 | $2,584 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 12 | $30,203 | $900 | $29,303 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 48 | $14,180 | $0 | $14,180 |
Speech Communication | 03 | $1,281 | $0 | $1,281 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 02 | $398 | $0 | $398 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 1,284 | $1,575,162 | $0 | $1,575,162 |
Daily Living | 116 | $55,277 | $0 | $55,277 |
Environmental Adaptations | 05 | $1,386 | $0 | $1,386 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 15 | $5,549 | $0 | $5,549 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 1,473 | $1,653,233 | $0 | $1,653,233 |
The MassMATCH Long-term Device Loan Program was contacted by a local Senior Center on behalf of one of their members who greatly valued her independence. “Ann” was concerned that her ability to drive may be in jeopardy because as she aged, her already small stature was steadily diminishing, making it increasingly difficult to reach the gas and brake pedals in her car. In addition, putting the driver’s seat in the front most position caused her seat belt to fit improperly, creating a very unsafe situation for her. The LTDLP staff helped Ann fill out an application and was able to provide her with gas and brake pedal extenders, making driving a much safer and more comfortable experience. As a result, Ann is now more active in the community as she can now drive with no hesitation. The use of assistive technology has resulted in improved quality of life for Ann.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 43 | 15 | 635 | 693 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 39 | 00 | 50 | 89 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 73 | 05 | 220 | 298 |
4. Subtotal | 155 | 20 | 905 | 1,080 |
5. None of the above | 37 | 06 | 158 | 201 |
6. Subtotal | 192 | 26 | 1,063 | 1,281 |
7. Nonrespondent | 05 | 00 | 199 | 204 |
8. Total | 197 | 26 | 1,262 | 1,485 |
9. Performance on this measure | 78.68% | 76.92% | 71.71% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 440 | 29.63% |
Satisfied | 105 | 7.07% |
Satisfied somewhat | 31 | 2.09% |
Not at all satisfied | 01 | 0.07% |
Nonrespondent | 908 | 61.14% |
Total Surveyed | 1,485 | |
Response rate % | 38.86% |
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 456 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 40 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 60 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 57 |
Total | 613 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 176 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 193 |
Representative of Education | 70 |
Representative of Employment | 15 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 49 |
Representatives of Community Living | 16 |
Representatives of Technology | 94 |
Total | 613 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 30 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number |
---|---|
Vision | 147 |
Hearing | 81 |
Speech Communication | 135 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 105 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 16 |
Daily Living | 192 |
Environmental Adaptations | 95 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 447 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 02 |
Total | 1,220 |
Chris is a 56 year old man with cerebral palsy, total blindness and a minimal intellectual disability. He was first referred to the ATRC-Boston by the AT Director at the MA Assoc. for the Blind and Visually Impaired training program. “Chris wanted technology that felt comfortable to him, but also gave him the freedom of movement and control that he has never had before due to his circumstances.” After being introduced to the wide range of possible options available to him at the ATRC-Boston, Chris borrowed a laptop, but quickly discovered that it was not the right device for easy mobility. So the ATRC-Boston staff suggested he trial an iPad Pro with a keyboard instead. Once he met Siri on the iPad he began using his voice to control his technology. Chris discovered he could do many of the things he was having frustrations with in his daily life, like surfing the web and playing music. In addition, Chris’ motor coordination made it difficult for him to do things like plug in the power cord, or turn the volume up or down. The ATRC-Boston staff and Chris’ trainer worked together to find the right accessories and made the necessary adjustments. Once it was determined that the iPad was the way to go for Chris, the ATRC-Boston staff referred Chris’ Dept. of Developmental Services counselor to the MassMATCH Assistive Technology Loan Program to help obtain funding to purchase an iPad Pro for Chris. According to the counselor, “Chris’ CP, blindness and life circumstances like foster care placement resulted in severely limiting his life experiences.” Today, with the use of assistive technology, Chris’ life has changed dramatically for the better. He now has a job working as a DJ at a nursing home and hopes to someday work in radio.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 119 | 21 | 114 | 254 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 32 | 10 | 49 | 91 |
Subtotal | 151 | 31 | 163 | 345 |
Have not made a decision | 24 | 08 | 16 | 48 |
Subtotal | 175 | 39 | 179 | 393 |
Nonrespondent | 24 | 06 | 33 | 63 |
Total | 199 | 45 | 212 | 456 |
Performance on this measure | 79.22% | 72.26% | 81.32% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 11 | 12 | 44 | 67 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 07 | 04 | 15 | 26 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 08 | 01 | 02 | 11 |
4. Subtotal | 26 | 17 | 61 | 104 |
5. None of the above | 08 | 06 | 15 | 29 |
6. Subtotal | 34 | 23 | 76 | 133 |
7. Nonrespondent | 08 | 01 | 15 | 24 |
8. Total | 42 | 24 | 91 | 157 |
9. Performance on this measure | 66.33% | 71.88% | 71.14% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 442 | 72.1% |
Satisfied | 55 | 8.97% |
Satisfied somewhat | 09 | 1.47% |
Not at all satisfied | 06 | 0.98% |
Nonrespondent | 101 | 16.48% |
Total Surveyed | 613 | |
Response rate % | 83.52% |
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 30 |
Hearing | 13 |
Speech Communication | 33 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 20 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 11 |
Daily Living | 13 |
Environmental Adaptations | 15 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 38 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 02 |
Total # of Devices Loaned | 175 |
Type of Participant | Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 85 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 45 |
Representatives of Education | 23 |
Representatives of Employment | 17 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 10 |
Representative of Community Living | 21 |
Representative of Technology | 07 |
Total | 208 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 29 |
Service Provider | 40 |
Vendor | 29 |
Repair Service | 13 |
Others | 00 |
Total | 111 |
Mary had been concerned with her seating and positioning, specially in bed at night. She came into the AT Regional Center in Pittsfield, MA to learn about the pressure mapping technology that had recently been added to the inventory. After the staff demonstrated the different types of PMT systems available for loan, how they work, etc., Mary decided to borrow a mattress-size pressure mapping system to use in her home. According to Mary, the results from her pressure mapping sessions over the period of the loan revealed no issues with her pressure points. As a result of the demonstration and subsequent device loan, Mary was able to obtain excellent information about her seating and positioning and as a result relieved that she is not doing damage to herself, especially in the way she sleeps.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 25 | 21 | 67 | 113 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 01 | 02 | 17 | 20 |
Subtotal | 26 | 23 | 84 | 133 |
Have not made a decision | 03 | 02 | 14 | 19 |
Subtotal | 29 | 25 | 98 | 152 |
Nonrespondent | 05 | 04 | 14 | 23 |
Total | 34 | 29 | 112 | 175 |
Performance on this measure | 76.47% | 79.31% | 75% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 143 | 68.75% |
Satisfied | 33 | 15.87% |
Satisfied somewhat | 12 | 5.77% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 20 | 9.62% |
Total | 208 | |
Response rate % | 90.38% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 54 | 28 | 697 | 779 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 46 | 04 | 69 | 119 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 81 | 06 | 222 | 309 |
4. Subtotal | 181 | 38 | 988 | 1,207 |
5. None of the above | 45 | 12 | 176 | 233 |
6. Subtotal | 226 | 50 | 1,164 | 1,440 |
7. Nonrespondent | 13 | 01 | 214 | 228 |
8. Total | 239 | 51 | 1,378 | 1,668 |
9. Performance on this measure | 75.73% | 74.51% | 71.7% | 72.36% |
ACL Performance Measure | 75% | 75% | 75% | 75% |
Met/Not Met | Met | Not Met | Not Met | Not Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 144 | 42 | 181 | 367 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 33 | 12 | 66 | 111 |
Subtotal | 177 | 54 | 247 | 478 |
Have not made a decision | 27 | 10 | 30 | 67 |
Subtotal | 204 | 64 | 277 | 545 |
Nonrespondent | 29 | 10 | 47 | 86 |
Total | 233 | 74 | 324 | 631 |
Performance on this measure | 75.97% | 72.97% | 76.23% | 75.75% |
ACL Performance Measure | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met | Not Met | Met | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 63 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 11 |
Representatives of Education | 78 |
Representatives of Employment | 04 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 95 |
Representatives of Community Living | 174 |
Representatives of Technology | 06 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 |
TOTAL | 431 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
431 | 00 | 00 | 431 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 62 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 13 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 12 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 188 |
Transition | 156 |
Total | 431 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
During FY17, MassMATCH was awarded a 2016 High Impact Innovative Technology Assistance Grant from the Dana and Christopher Reeves Foundation to carry out the Weight and Seating Independence Project (WSIP). The goals & objectives of the project are to improve the independence, autonomy and control of health and wellness by persons with SCI in central and western Massachusetts. The primary objective is to enable knowledge and use of digital pressure mapping technology and wheelchair accessible scales in the least restrictive environment. To improve access to wheelchair accessible scales, MassMATCH has provided roll-on scales for use by wheelchair users at the four Independent Living Center sites (ILCs) serving Central and Western Massachusetts. The scales are durable and large enough to accommodate most power and manual wheelchairs, including those with a bariatric wheelbase. MassMATCH has also equipped two of our AT Regional Center (ATRC) locations in Pittsfield and Worcester with portable wheelchair accessible scales for both demonstrations and short-term loans. To improve access to digital pressure mapping technology, MassMATCH acquired a variety of PMT systems (pediatric,mattress, bariatric, and adult digital pressure mapping systems) for demonstration and short-term loan to individuals. The ATRCs at both UCP Berkshire and Easter Seals MA have become demonstration sites for digital pressure mapping technology. The most innovative feature of WSIP is the series of 4 PMT trainings conducted to build and improve the region’s knowledge of and capacity with these mapping systems (and encourage seating and positioning troubleshooting). The four-hour trainings were provided by veterans of wheelchair seating and positioning, under the leadership of Mary Jo Wagner of the Mass. Dept. of Developmental Services (DDS), who frequently uses pressure mapping technology in her work. Trainees learned about pressure injuries, their stages, causes and risks and how to prevent them, including positioning for sitting and sleeping. They also learned how digital pressure mapping can be used to understand the unique needs of individual wheelchair users. The PMT trainings were targeted at ATRC staff ,health care service networks serving persons with paralysis in their homes and/or outpatient settings; 43 individuals attended the PMT trainings. ATRC staff attended the trainings and have started using the knowledge acquired to provide demonstrations for wheelchair users, family members/caregivers and area professionals interested in borrowing the equipment during and beyond the grant-funded period. 100% of participants were highly satisfied with the trainings and indicated that they would highly recommend them to others.
Breifly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
During FY17, MassMATCH staff collaborated with our partners at the MA Executive Office of Elder Affairs (EOEA) to develop and host a series of 12 assistive technology trainings across the state. 10 of them were considered Basic while 2 were classified as Advanced. The Basic training introduced the concept of assistive technology, types of devices available and how they are used, and shared information about AT resources in the state. The Advanced training provided a more detailed exploration of the use of AT, using the Transition Assistance to Community Living Environment (TACLE) assessment tool. This simple tool, developed under MassMATCH, helps consumers and professionals identify areas of independent living in which the consumer may benefit from the use of assistive technology, and help them identify specific devices and resources to acquire the needed AT. 58 individuals attended the trainings, including transition coordinators, waiver case managers, housing transition entities, options counselors and other staff from the 'No Wrong Door' system who assist individuals with disabilities or elders in transitioning to the community and living more independently. There were also staff from other Aging and Disability Resource Consortia Community Partners such as Adult Family Care, Veterans Service Officers, Supported Living Providers, Housing Authorities, Councils on Aging, Home care providers, Community Health Care workers, SHINE staff and others.
Breifly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
Due to its limited in-house capacity, MassMATCH is collaborating with one of our partner agencies to develop a series of in-person trainings that will address a variety of topics dealing with the accessibility of information and communication technology (ICT). These trainings will be offered in spring/summer 2018, and the resulting data reported as part of the FY18 Annual Progress Report.
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 00 |
Training or Technique Assistance will be developed or implemented | 01 |
No known outcome at this time | 04 |
Nonrespondent | 07 |
Total | 12 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 8.3% |
RSA Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Not Met |
Education | 0% |
---|---|
Employment | 0% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 34.6% |
Representative of Community Living | 46.2% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 19.2% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
As stated elsewhere, during FY17, MassMATCH was awarded a 2016 High Impact Innovative Technology Assistance Grant from the Dana and Christopher Reeves Foundation to carry out the Weight and Seating Independence Project (WSIP). The goals of the project are to improve the independence, autonomy and control of health and wellness by persons with SCI in central and western Massachusetts. The primary objective is to enable knowledge and use of digital pressure mapping technology and wheelchair accessible scales in the least restrictive environment. As the digital pressure mapping technology is targeted at the general public - wheelchair users, family members/caregivers, service networks serving persons with paralysis in their homes and/or outpatient settings - MassMATCH staff strongly believed that creating a user manual for the PMTs is critical. Consequently, we provided technical assistance to MA DDS to produce a user-friendly how-to protocol for use and distribution with the PMT system
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
During FY17, MassMATCH staff provided technical assistance to three Independent Living Centers in Central and Western Massachusetts in connection with the Weight and Seating Independence Project. MassMATCH staff helped determine the most suitable conditions to ensure the smooth operation of the wheelchair accessible platform scales at their respective locations in Worcester, Springfield, Amherst, and Pittsfield, MA. MassMATCH staff provided advice on issues to consider such as the amount of space needed, the positioning and installation of the platform scales, the mounting of the displays, etc. As a result of the TA provided, all four platform scales are fully operational and serving the needs of people with SCI in Central and Western Massachusetts. The availability of the scales is making it easier for persons with disabilities who need to transition from institutional living into the community to do so, knowing that they can now easily weigh themselves at any of the participating I
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. In FY17, in addition to our usual public awareness activities, we embarked on a set of targeted public AT presentations/demonstrations in connection with a new grant award we received from the Dana and Christopher Reeves Foundation. The award is funding our Weight and Seating Independence Project (WSIP), which aims to improve the independence, autonomy and control of health and wellness by persons with SCI in central and western Massachusetts by increasing awareness of and providing access to digital pressure mapping technology and wheelchair accessible scales in the least restrictive environment. To publicize the launch of the project and availability of the scales and PMT system, we carried out a multi-faceted outreach campaign involving electronic and printed flyers, Facebook/blog postings, newsletter and email articles, etc. We also brought examples of both items to some of the larger events we attend, such as the 3-day Abilities Expo, the annual Human Service Providers Conference, and the annual statewide ADA celebration hosted by the Statewide Independent Living Council. At each event, MassMATCH staff gave brief presentations about MassMATCH and the Weight and Seating Independence Project and demonstrated both the PMT and the wheelchair accessible scale. The presentations/demonstrations were very successful as they provided participants with valuable information about available AT resources in the state as well as concrete evidence of the impact of AT. Between the 6 presentation/demonstration events, about 148 people with disabilities tried out the PMT and portable accessible scales first-hand. Overall, these outreach activities reached approximately 2,345 people and contributed a great deal towards the public’s understanding of what is AT and where they can find or learn more about AT in Massachusetts.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 814 | 1,052 | 1,866 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 886 | 170 | 1,056 |
Representative of Education | 62 | 545 | 607 |
Representative of Employment | 71 | 453 | 524 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 337 | 779 | 1,116 |
Representative of Community Living | 90 | 121 | 211 |
Representative of Technology | 10 | 10 | 20 |
Unable to Categorize | 425 | 243 | 668 |
Total | 2,695 | 3,373 | 6,068 |
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
---|
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? | Yes |
---|
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds |
---|---|---|
State Appropriations | $34,000 | State Financing |
State Appropriations | $392,265 | Reuse |
Public/State Agency | $35,000 | Reuse |
Private | $74,878 | Device Loan |
State Appropriations | $59,200 | Device Loan |
Amount: $595,343 |
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Individuals Served | Other Outcome |
---|
Association of Assistive Technology Act Programs . Saved: Fri May 04 2018 15:25:20 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time)