National Assistive Technology Act Data System

Annual Progress Report - Full Report

Back to state program information page

Colorado 2017

General Information

Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)

State AT Program Title:

Assistive Technology Program of Colorado

State AT Program Title:

State AT Program URL

www.assistivetechnologypartners.org

Mailing Address:

1201 5th St., Suite 240

City:

Denver

State:

Zip Code:

80204

Program Email:

generalinfo@AT_Partners.org

Phone:

3033151280

TTY:

3033151270

Lead Agency

Agency Name:

Assistive Technology Partners

Mailing Address:

1201 5th St., Suite 240

City:

Denver

State:

Zip Code:

80204

Program URL:

www.assistivetechnologypartners.org

Implementing Entity

Does your Lead Agency contract with an Implementing Entity to carry out the Statewide AT Program on its behalf? (Check if Yes)

Name of Implementing Agency:

Mailing Address:

City

State:

Zip Code:

Program URL:

Program Director and Other Contacts

Program Director for State AT Program (last, first):

Melonis, Maureen

Title:

Program Director

Phone:

3033151283

E-mail:

maureen.melonis@ucdenver.edu

Program Director at Lead Agency (last, first):

Melonis, Maureen

Title:

Program Director

Phone:

3033151283

E-mail:

maureen.melonis@ucdenver.edu

Primary Contact at Implementing Agency (last, first) - If applicable:

Title:

Phone:

E-mail:

Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director

Name (last, first):

Beems, Julia

Title:

Outreach Coordinator

Phone:

3033151284

E-mail:

julia.beems@ucdenver.edu

Certifying Representative

Name (last, first):

Beidler, Nathan

Title:

Postaward Admin

Phone:

3037240110

E-mail:

nathan.beidler@ucdenver.edu

State Financing

Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing?

Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program?

B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan?

C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan?

D. Anecdote

Impact Area Education Employment Commumity Living

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response	Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed			Total
Response	Education	Employment	Community Living	Total
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program.	00	00	00	00
2. AT was only available through the AT program.	00	00	00	00
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long.	00	00	00	00
4. Subtotal	00	00	00	00
5. None of the above	00	00	00	00
6. Subtotal	00	00	00	00
7. Nonrespondent	00	00	00	00
8. Total	00	00	00	00
9. Performance on this measure	NaN%	NaN%	NaN%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services	Number of Customers	Percent
Highly satisfied	00	NaN%
Satisfied	00	NaN%
Satisfied somewhat	00	NaN%
Not at all satisfied	00	NaN%
Nonrespondent	00	NaN%
Total Surveyed	00
Response rate %	NaN%

G. Notes:

Reutilization

Did your approved State Plan for this reporting period included conducting any device reuse activities?

A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices

Activity	Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity
A. Device Exchange	196
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan	169
C. Total	365

Performance Measure
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure	196
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients	00
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures	169

If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

B. Device Exchange Activities

Device Exchange
Type of AT Device	Number of Devices Exchanged	Total Estimated Current Purchase Price	Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged	Savings to Consumers
Vision	09	$5,150	$1,265	$3,885
Hearing	09	$3,230	$1,216	$2,014
Speech Communication	41	$44,375	$9,125	$35,250
Learning, Cognition and Developmental	17	$1,248	$1,040	$208
Mobility, Seating and Positioning	38	$46,400	$12,685	$33,715
Daily Living	16	$5,092	$1,794	$3,298
Environmental Adaptations	08	$1,800	$594	$1,206
Vehicle Modification & Transportation	20	$444,660	$210,560	$234,100
Computers and Related	30	$17,070	$3,994	$13,076
Recreation, Sports and Leisure	08	$5,272	$1,589	$3,683
Total	196	$574,297	$243,862	$330,435

C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities

Device Reassign/Repair/Refurbish and/or OEL
Type of AT Device	Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired	Total Estimated Current Purchase Price	Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold	Savings to Consumers
Vision	28	$2,214	$0	$2,214
Hearing	00	$0	$0	$0
Speech Communication	47	$6,981	$0	$6,981
Learning, Cognition and Developmental	65	$2,034	$0	$2,034
Mobility, Seating and Positioning	02	$256	$0	$256
Daily Living	14	$178	$0	$178
Environmental Adaptations	13	$561	$0	$561
Vehicle Modification & Transportation	00	$0	$0	$0
Computers and Related	00	$0	$0	$0
Recreation, Sports and Leisure	00	$0	$0	$0
Total	169	$12,224	$0	$12,224

D. Anecdote

A young nine year old boy with spastic cerebral palsy came into the office to consider different access for his augmentative alternative communication device and wheelchair. The family wanted to explore the possibility of two switch scanning prior to purchasing another switch. They borrowed a second switch and trialed it for six months. After receiving consultation and training they determined that it was not an effective choice for him.

Impact Area Education Employment Commumity Living

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response	Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed			Total
Response	Education	Employment	Community Living	Total
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program.	36	12	97	145
2. AT was only available through the AT program.	01	03	12	16
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long.	00	00	08	08
4. Subtotal	37	15	117	169
5. None of the above	00	00	00	00
6. Subtotal	37	15	117	169
7. Nonrespondent	00	00	00	00
8. Total	37	15	117	169
9. Performance on this measure	100%	100%	100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services	Number of Customers	Percent
Highly satisfied	09	2.47%
Satisfied	349	95.62%
Satisfied somewhat	05	1.37%
Not at all satisfied	02	0.55%
Nonrespondent	00	0%
Total Surveyed	365
Response rate %	100%

G. Notes:

Device Loan

Did your approved State Plan for this reporting period included conducting Short-Term Device Loans?

A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose

Loans By Purpose
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan	Number
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation)	955
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding	50
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation	36
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity	78
Total	1,119

B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower

Loans By Borrower Type
Type of Individual or Entity	Number of Device Borrowers
Individuals with Disabilities	325
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives	01
Representative of Education	656
Representative of Employment	00
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation	00
Representatives of Community Living	137
Representatives of Technology	00
Total	1,119

C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans

Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days	42

D. Types of Devices Loaned

Types of Devices Loaned
Type of AT Device	Number
Vision	01
Hearing	06
Speech Communication	502
Learning, Cognition and Developmental	425
Mobility, Seating and Positioning	42
Daily Living	35
Environmental Adaptations	24
Vehicle Modification and Transportation	00
Computers and Related	47
Recreation, Sports and Leisure	37
Total	1,119

E. Anecdote

A young man with Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 1 (SMA-type 1) attends one of our schools . With this degenerative diagnosis he requires assisted ventilation by tracheostomy making him ventilator dependent. He has very limited voluntary motor movement at this time. He currently uses a Tobii eye-gaze system for communication. He fatigues quickly with eye gaze but is successful for short periods of time. The assistive technology team was looking for alternative access points to provide opportunities for him to participate in school activities when his eyes become tired. We began using sensitivity switches to support his limited motor movements. This young man has been able to operate two switches. We borrowed a set of switches and the bongo drums from the loan bank to begin our search for access points and motivation. Because of his success, he is now participating in band class. He has also participated in a class play where he was able to speak a line and throw a rotten tomato on cue, per his role, with the use of his switches. We continue to tweak and search for alternative ways for him to participate with his peers. His happiness in having control over his environment has been a true motivator for the team to continue to seek out new possibilities for him.

Impact Area Education Employment Commumity Living

F. Access Performance Measures

Access Performance Measures
Response	Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed			Total
Response	Education	Employment	Community Living	Total
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs	304	17	56	377
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs	444	08	20	472
Subtotal	748	25	76	849
Have not made a decision	00	00	00	00
Subtotal	748	25	76	849
Nonrespondent	106	00	00	106
Total	854	25	76	955
Performance on this measure	91.57%	100%	100%

G. Acquisition Performance Measures

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response	Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed			Total
Response	Education	Employment	Community Living	Total
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program.	00	00	00	00
2. AT was only available through the AT program.	71	25	68	164
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long.	00	00	00	00
4. Subtotal	71	25	68	164
5. None of the above	00	00	00	00
6. Subtotal	71	25	68	164
7. Nonrespondent	00	00	00	00
8. Total	71	25	68	164
9. Performance on this measure	100%	100%	100%

H. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services	Number of Customers	Percent
Highly satisfied	763	68.19%
Satisfied	201	17.96%
Satisfied somewhat	22	1.97%
Not at all satisfied	04	0.36%
Nonrespondent	129	11.53%
Total Surveyed	1,119
Response rate %	88.47%

I. Notes:

Device Demonstration

A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type

Demonstrations by Device Type
Type of AT Device / Service	Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services
Vision	03
Hearing	25
Speech Communication	127
Learning, Cognition and Developmental	20
Mobility, Seating and Positioning	330
Daily Living	06
Environmental Adaptations	18
Vehicle Modification and Transportation	00
Computers and Related	68
Recreation, Sports and Leisure	00
Total # of Devices Loaned	597

B. Types of Participants

Demonstrations by Participant Type
Type of Participant	Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations
Individuals with Disabilities	525
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives	317
Representatives of Education	12
Representatives of Employment	12
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation	42
Representative of Community Living	09
Representative of Technology	07
Total	924

C. Number of Referrals

Referrals
Type of Entity	Number of Referrals
Funding Source (non-AT program)	39
Service Provider	51
Vendor	71
Repair Service	02
Others	00
Total	163

D. Anecdote

Young Talon visited the Colorado Assistive Technology Program in January. Talon was almost three with a history of enutero stroke resulting in spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. He was receiving early intervention services and his team determined that he needed a manual wheelchair. Unfortunately, Medicaid denied the first chair recommendation, so a different manual chair had to be prescribed. He was also evaluated for his potential to drive a power wheelchair. As part of that evaluation, a power chair was loaned to him so more practice would help determine if a power chair was feasible. He was so excited to be able to use a power chair. It allowed him the opportunity to learn to drive it and to practice while playing with his friends on the playground at his preschool. Talon shows great potential for driving a power wheelchair and will probably have one of his own in the near future so he can truly have independent mobility!

Impact Area Education Employment Commumity Living

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response	Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed			Total
Response	Education	Employment	Community Living	Total
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs	74	64	316	454
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs	29	07	107	143
Subtotal	103	71	423	597
Have not made a decision	00	00	00	00
Subtotal	103	71	423	597
Nonrespondent	00	00	00	00
Total	103	71	423	597
Performance on this measure	100%	100%	100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services	Number of Customers	Percent
Highly satisfied	756	81.82%
Satisfied	164	17.75%
Satisfied somewhat	04	0.43%
Not at all satisfied	00	0%
Nonrespondent	00	0%
Total	924
Response rate %	100%

G. Notes:

Overall Performance Measures

Overall Acquisition Performance Measure

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response	Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed			Total
Response	Education	Employment	Community Living	Total
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program.	36	12	97	145
2. AT was only available through the AT program.	72	28	80	180
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long.	00	00	08	08
4. Subtotal	108	40	185	333
5. None of the above	00	00	00	00
6. Subtotal	108	40	185	333
7. Nonrespondent	00	00	00	00
8. Total	108	40	185	333
9. Performance on this measure	100%	100%	100%	100%
ACL Performance Measure	75%	75%	75%	75%
Met/Not Met	Met	Met	Met	Met

Overall Access Performance Measure

Access Performance Measures
Response	Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed			Total
Response	Education	Employment	Community Living	Total
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs	378	81	372	831
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs	473	15	127	615
Subtotal	851	96	499	1,446
Have not made a decision	00	00	00	00
Subtotal	851	96	499	1,446
Nonrespondent	106	00	00	106
Total	957	96	499	1,552
Performance on this measure	88.92%	100%	100%	93.17%
ACL Performance Measure	70%	70%	70%	70%
Met/Not Met	Met	Met	Met	Met

Training

A. Training Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution

Training by Participant Type
Type of Participant	Number
Individuals with Disabilities	42
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives	53
Representatives of Education	2,097
Representatives of Employment	02
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation	490
Representatives of Community Living	313
Representatives of Technology	1,855
Unable to Categorize	00
TOTAL	4,852

Geographic Distribution of Participants
Metro	Non Metro	Unknown	TOTAL
3,954	898	00	4,852

B. Training Topics

Trainings by Topic
Primary Topic of Training	Participants
AT Products/Services	2,190
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice	34
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access	1,935
Combination of any/all of the above	326
Transition	367
Total	4,852

B. Description of Training Activities

Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:

Emergency Preparedness for Persons with Disabilities: Be Your Own Hero: An emergency preparedness training was provided for persons with disabilities that use assistive technology. Information was shared on making sure emergency alerts and warnings are accessible to them, what options they have for including assistive technology in their emergency plans and low-tech options to consider in their Go Kits. Information was also provided on power outages and options for alternative charging for power dependent devices. The 8 hour training was provided in 6 locations around Colorado ( 3 metro and 3 non-metro) to 76 individuals with disabilities, family members, caregivers and professionals. Each participant began completing their own emergency assessments and plans to determine next steps and received an emergency Go Kit starter kit with basic emergency supplies and low tech assistive technology specific to their disability. Since completion of the training series additional schools and organizations have begun requesting the training for their particular population/community.

Breifly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

On November 17, 2016 a training was provided to 189 Early Intervention Providers and Service Coordinators entitled: A Framework for Assistive Technology in Early Intervention. This training was offered live in Denver and via teleconferencing to 21 sites throughout Colorado. A major topic at the training was assisting clinicians and coordinators in understanding the process for ensuring that children transition to public school programs at age three with the assistive technology they need. Previously in Colorado and nationwide, the number of Individual Family Service Plans with assistive technology documented on them was 4%. After the training, the numbers in Colorado are now up to 9% and continuing to climb.

Breifly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:

Making Print Materials Accessible: It’s Easier than You Think Description: This session focused on streamlining the process of making supplementary educational materials accessible to students with print disabilities; typically a time consuming and technically challenging process involving scanners, OCR software, and transferring files. The session explored options for quick and easy conversion of documents to accessible formats using mobile technologies and the web. Options for reading these materials once converted were discussed as well. Learning Outcomes: • Attendees will be able to scan and read print materials in less than 10 seconds • Attendees will be able to convert worksheets and articles to accessible electronic formats using mobile devices and cloud storage • Attendees will be familiar with options for cloud conversion of print materials • Attendees will become familiar with mobile, web and desktop options for reading converted materials.

D. IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure

IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received	Number
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies	1,871
Training or Technique Assistance will be developed or implemented	64
No known outcome at this time	00
Nonrespondent	00
Total	1,935
Performance Measure Percentage	100%
RSA Target Percentage	70%
Met/Not Met	Met

E. Notes:

Technical Assistance

A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance

Technical Assistance by Recipient Type
Education	34%
Employment	0%
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation	33%
Representative of Community Living	22%
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT)	11%
Total	100%

B. Description of Technical Assistance

Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:

Assistive Technology Partners performed accessibility review and assistive technology testing on Healthcare.gov’s Find Local Help search feature. This feature enables individuals to find and connect with professionals who assist with the process of identifying and procuring health insurance plans under the Affordable Care Act. The work we completed and subsequent consultation ensured that this valuable service is equally accessible to individuals with disabilities. Assistive Technology Partners also evaluated and tested the Help on Demand call back feature available on California’s health care exchange website “Covered California”. Help on Demand enables a person to request a call back to receive professional assistance regarding their plan options.

Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

Assistive Technology Partners was contracted to produce documentation and to perform accessibility testing supporting the administration of nationwide assessments measuring high school achievement, high school equivalency and college readiness. The companies and organizations requested expertise relating to the following areas, 1) Technical support documentation designed to help school based IT coordinators be prepared for successful delivery of Smarter Balanced computer based assessments when used in conjunction with assistive technologies, 2) documentation for educators, parents and students with disabilities taking the GED high school equivalency examination, and 3) accessibility analysis and consultation of the content of GED Testing Services’ website.

C. Notes:

Public Awareness

Public Awareness Narratives

Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.

1. SWAAAC Summer Symposium 2017 - This 2 day conference event, held June 12th & 13th, 2017 featured workshops with Luis Perez, Maureen Donnelly, and Michael O’Leary of the AAC Institute. In addition to the 1/2 day workshops, participants were able to choose from over 30 breakout sessions and Interactive Intervals. The event registered 176 participants from 52 administrative units, institutions of higher education, and community organizations. In an effort to infuse the event with technology and a fresh approach to participation, the schedule, presenter and participant biographical sketches, handouts, session evaluations, and networking opportunities were delivered via the mobile Whova app. Evaluation survey data indicated very high impact in terms of acquisition of new knowledge and skills (4.5/5) and positive impact on student achievement (4.6/5). One hundred percent of participants indicated their intent to share newly acquired knowledge with others Surveys were based on a 5-point Likert Scale with one defined as strongly disagree and five defined as strongly agree. Session evaluation data for the 50 individual workshops and breakout sessions was extremely positive and is available upon request.

2. CEMA Annual Conference 2017 - We attended the 2 day annual Colorado Emergency Managers Association annual conference with 460 attendees representing Emergency Managers, First Responders (Police, Fire, & EMS), 911 Call Center staff, public Health Depts, State Homeland Security staff, FEMA Region VIII staff and other interested parties. We provided information at our booth specific to the inclusion of people with disabilities in the emergency planning process, the inclusion of assistive technology in the planning process for both individuals, organizations, and shelters. We also provided demonstrations of the use of AAC devices with pre-programmed emergency messages for fire, medical, utility, police and non-emergency police calls. Individuals followed-up with calls regarding future collaborations with trainings provided over the summer and fall, and requested equipment trainings/demonstrations for their staff.

Information And Assistance

Information And Assistance Activities by Recipient
Types of Recipients	AT Device/ Service	AT Funding	Total
Individuals with Disabilities	4,238	1,196	5,434
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives	6,188	1,690	7,878
Representative of Education	3,822	1,716	5,538
Representative of Employment	1,274	884	2,158
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation	3,172	2,054	5,226
Representative of Community Living	1,352	910	2,262
Representative of Technology	4,082	2,496	6,578
Unable to Categorize	130	26	156
Total	24,258	10,972	35,230

Notes:

State Improvement Outcomes

State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting?

A. State Improvements

1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.

The Tech Act Program Director attended monthly meetings with the State Speech Language Pathology Advisory Council. This group has been editing several statewide guidelines on speech language eligibility and service provision. The role of the advisory committee is to represent state perspective, to listen, analyze, think strategically, and to provide advice to the Colorado Department of Education (CDE) about issues which will in turn help the CDE make informed decisions. Through these meetings, the council increased awareness of the value of assistive technology and the importance of including it in all relevant documentation from the state. One outcome is the addition of a unique communication needs section on the Individual Education Plan so that team members can better document the augmentative alternative communication systems that students are using.

2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)

We added the question “Does the student have unique communication needs” and created training around this so that individuals would document augmentative alternative communication here among other things. The question about assistive technology intentionally immediately follows this question on the form.The link to the new IEP form can be found here and is called IEP review. https://www.cde.state.co.us/cdesped/iep_forms.

3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?

Education

B. State Improvements

1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.

In collaboration with different 911 Call Centers around Colorado, a protocol was developed for the type and order of emergency call messages delivered to the call dispatchers by individuals using AAC/SGA devices. These messages can be sent with a one button full message, or multi button individual answer messages. Prior to this, the Call Centers did not know about such devices and how they could be utilized to make emergency calls. Speech Language Pathologists also did not know what type of information to include or in what order.

A handout was developed that includes specific messages for medical emergencies, fire emergencies, utility emergencies, police emergencies and non-emergency police call along with additional questions that may be asked dependent on the emergency to be programmed into AAC/SGA devices for emergency communication. The handout is being distributed to 911 Call Centers to know what is being programmed. Speech Language Pathologists are also receiving this information so they can program the devices and have their client practice calling the dispatchers so they know what to expect and how to use the messages. A copy of this handout is available from julia.beems@ucdenver.edu.

3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?

Technology (ICT accessibility and AT

Additional And Leveraged Funds

Additional and Leveraged Funds

Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report?

A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities

State Plan Activities
Fund Source	Amount	Use of Funds
Public/State Agency	$6,249	Training
Public/State Agency	$8,749	Device Loan
Public/State Agency	$162,809	Device Loan
Public/State Agency	$9,999	Technical Assistance
Public/State Agency	$162,809	Training
Public/State Agency	$139,551	Technical Assistance
	Amount: $490,166

B. Leveraged Funding for Activities Not in State Plan (data not previously reported in other activity sections)

Non-State Plan Activities
Fund Source	Amount	Use of Funds	Individuals Served	Other Outcome

C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).

Back to state program information page | Top of page

This FY17 State AT Program Annual Progress Report was exported from the National Assistive Technology Act Data System (NATADS). NATADS was developed with partial support from the Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance.

Association of Assistive Technology Act Programs . Saved: Fri May 04 2018 15:20:49 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time)