Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
Area of Residence | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
Approved Loan made | 25 | 25 | 50 |
Approved Not made | 03 | 00 | 03 |
Rejected | 15 | 05 | 20 |
Total | 43 | 30 | 73 |
Lowest Income: | $8,796 | Highest Income: | $145,600 |
---|
Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
---|---|---|
$1,993,118 | 50 | $39,862 |
Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
Number of Loans | 03 | 20 | 14 | 04 | 08 | 01 | 50 |
Percentage of Loans | 6% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 16% | 2% | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 50 | 100% |
Partnership Loans | 0% | |
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
With interest buy-down only | 00 | 0% |
With loan guarantee only | 00 | 0% |
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
Total | 50 | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 50 | $799,412 |
Partnership Loans | 00 | $0 |
Total | 50 | $799,412 |
Lowest | 4% |
---|---|
Highest | 4.5% |
Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
---|---|---|
219 | 50 | 4.38% |
Interest Rate | Number of loans |
---|---|
0.0% to 2.0% | 00 |
2.1% to 4.0% | 08 |
4.1% to 6.0% | 42 |
6.1% to 8.0% | 00 |
8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
14.1% + | 00 |
Total | 50 |
Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Vision | 01 | $2,995 |
Hearing | 10 | $26,120 |
Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 07 | $34,035 |
Daily living | 00 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 01 | $5,085 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 31 | $731,177 |
Computers and related | 00 | $0 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
Total | 50 | $799,412 |
Number Loans in default | 17 |
---|---|
Net loss for loans in default | $73,867 |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 00 |
---|
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 00 |
---|
The Arkansas Alternative Financing Program (AFP) financed a modified vehicle to Randy Hammett who was having trouble finding transportation to and from his college classes. Mr. Hammett became very agitated because he was having trouble getting to class to obtain his education. It was difficult for him to get in and out of vehicles without having access to a wheelchair lift. He learned about the AFP through one of our vendors and applied for a modified vehicle loan. We were fortunate to help him obtain a modified vehicle with a low interest loan and affordable low monthly payments. Obtaining a modified vehicle has increased his overall independence and access to getting to school, participating in school events, community outings, visiting friends, family and doctor appointments. By providing this client a low interest loan, we were able to make his life better, more independent, and improve his mobility with daily activities.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 04 | 00 | 27 | 31 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 02 | 06 | 08 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 04 | 00 | 07 | 11 |
4. Subtotal | 08 | 02 | 40 | 50 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 08 | 02 | 40 | 50 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 08 | 02 | 40 | 50 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 32 | 64% |
Satisfied | 12 | 24% |
Satisfied somewhat | 06 | 12% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 50 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 00 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 753 |
C. Total | 753 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients | 00 |
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 753 |
If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 04 | $3,590 | $0 | $3,590 |
Hearing | 03 | $880 | $0 | $880 |
Speech Communication | 01 | $7,095 | $0 | $7,095 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 02 | $390 | $0 | $390 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 400 | $157,015 | $0 | $157,015 |
Daily Living | 321 | $94,083 | $0 | $94,083 |
Environmental Adaptations | 08 | $7,406 | $1,800 | $5,606 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 05 | $9,896 | $0 | $9,896 |
Computers and Related | 02 | $1,149 | $0 | $1,149 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 07 | $601 | $0 | $601 |
Total | 753 | $282,105 | $1,800 | $280,305 |
We received a phone call from an individual stating that he wished to donate a 1989 Chevy Van with a power wheelchair lift to a needy family. Immediately we thought of a single mom we recently met who had adopted a special needs child. The little girl had grown to the point that it was extremely difficult for the mother to transfer her. We knew this family was in need of a van equipped with a wheelchair lift and was unable to afford one. Soon after Christmas the mother came to ICAN to receive the van or as she referred to it, "her Christmas present." Recently we spoke with the mother just to thank us and let us know the van was allowing her to transport her daughter to school and doctor appointments. The mother stated she told friends about ICAN and will soon donate her daughter's outgrown wheelchair as soon as she receives a new one.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 29 | 10 | 671 | 710 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 01 | 02 | 11 | 14 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 03 | 03 | 23 | 29 |
4. Subtotal | 33 | 15 | 705 | 753 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 33 | 15 | 705 | 753 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 33 | 15 | 705 | 753 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 745 | 98.94% |
Satisfied | 07 | 0.93% |
Satisfied somewhat | 01 | 0.13% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 753 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 273 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 28 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 418 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 16 |
Total | 735 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 152 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 415 |
Representative of Education | 42 |
Representative of Employment | 10 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 96 |
Representatives of Community Living | 05 |
Representatives of Technology | 15 |
Total | 735 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 42 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number |
---|---|
Vision | 49 |
Hearing | 56 |
Speech Communication | 66 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 112 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 265 |
Daily Living | 191 |
Environmental Adaptations | 129 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 01 |
Computers and Related | 54 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 09 |
Total | 932 |
A lady who had some difficulty with vision, came to our AT lab after ordering several items from catalogues that simply did not help her. After viewing and testing several pieces of technology, she borrowed a hand held magnifier and a ruby. We provided her the opportunity to try them out in her environment. Following a trial period, she choose the 3x hand held lighted magnifier based on her need and affordability. She purchased the item and uses it daily at her desk, in her home and at church. A simple lighted magnifier was the technology that met her needs. Trying out the technology before purchase ensured the technology worked for her.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 87 | 21 | 127 | 235 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 09 | 06 | 23 | 38 |
Subtotal | 96 | 27 | 150 | 273 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Subtotal | 96 | 27 | 150 | 273 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 96 | 27 | 150 | 273 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 18 | 09 | 402 | 429 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 02 | 03 | 08 | 13 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 01 | 02 | 17 | 20 |
4. Subtotal | 21 | 14 | 427 | 462 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 21 | 14 | 427 | 462 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 21 | 14 | 427 | 462 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 714 | 97.14% |
Satisfied | 14 | 1.9% |
Satisfied somewhat | 07 | 0.95% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 735 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 12 |
Hearing | 15 |
Speech Communication | 06 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 48 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 02 |
Daily Living | 08 |
Environmental Adaptations | 32 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 40 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 |
Total # of Devices Loaned | 163 |
Type of Participant | Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 152 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 67 |
Representatives of Education | 29 |
Representatives of Employment | 17 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 97 |
Representative of Community Living | 35 |
Representative of Technology | 01 |
Total | 398 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 247 |
Service Provider | 22 |
Vendor | 05 |
Repair Service | 01 |
Others | 00 |
Total | 275 |
A gentlemen came to ICAN requesting hearing devices. He was wearing two hearing aids. The staff took time to listen to what problems he was experiencing at home, work and at restaurants. He had a great deal of problems hearing in an auditorium where his company meetings were taking place. The staff introduced him to Quattro, pocket talker and loop systems. The staff discussed with him the T coil setting on his hearing aid and how it would benefit him, especially, if there was a loop system already set up in the auditorium. The staff explained about the alternative financing program and Stay at Work program from Arkansas Rehabilitation Services. The gentlemen returned to his audiologist and had the t-coil option turned on. He was able to utilize the Quattro with his current hearing aids. He was delighted, now, he is not missing important information at work or in noisy environments.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 56 | 64 | 16 | 136 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 01 | 03 | 02 | 06 |
Subtotal | 57 | 67 | 18 | 142 |
Have not made a decision | 08 | 01 | 12 | 21 |
Subtotal | 65 | 68 | 30 | 163 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 65 | 68 | 30 | 163 |
Performance on this measure | 87.69% | 98.53% | 60% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 344 | 86.43% |
Satisfied | 51 | 12.81% |
Satisfied somewhat | 02 | 0.5% |
Not at all satisfied | 01 | 0.25% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total | 398 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 51 | 19 | 1,100 | 1,170 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 03 | 07 | 25 | 35 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 08 | 05 | 47 | 60 |
4. Subtotal | 62 | 31 | 1,172 | 1,265 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 62 | 31 | 1,172 | 1,265 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 62 | 31 | 1,172 | 1,265 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
ACL Performance Measure | 75% | 75% | 75% | 75% |
Met/Not Met | Met | Met | Met | Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 143 | 85 | 143 | 371 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 10 | 09 | 25 | 44 |
Subtotal | 153 | 94 | 168 | 415 |
Have not made a decision | 08 | 01 | 12 | 21 |
Subtotal | 161 | 95 | 180 | 436 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 161 | 95 | 180 | 436 |
Performance on this measure | 95.03% | 98.95% | 93.33% | 95.18% |
ACL Performance Measure | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met | Met | Met | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 48 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 18 |
Representatives of Education | 53 |
Representatives of Employment | 38 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 87 |
Representatives of Community Living | 127 |
Representatives of Technology | 01 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 |
TOTAL | 372 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
261 | 21 | 90 | 372 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 181 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 37 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 02 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 62 |
Transition | 90 |
Total | 372 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
High impact results have materialized from train the trainers. ICAN continues to partner and train health care providers that reach every corner of the State. LAMP (Language Acquisition Motor Planning) continues to partner and provide trainings to speech pathologist across the State. Three of the 4 occupational therapy (OT) schools within the State continue to bring new students each semester to be trained on a range of assistive technology devices. The key is to develop their skill in matching the technology to the person. These future therapist will provide treatment and intervention to people with disabilities from zero to death in all areas of life including community living, recreation, school and employment. It is important the therapist be knowledgeable of the intervention and use of assistive technology to increase the individuals independence in all areas of life and across the lifespan. These therapist also have an obligation to train family members, teachers and any other person supporting the individual with the disability.
Breifly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
ICAN collaborated and partnered with the Southwest ADA Center for Independent Living and University Arkansas Currents Program and Partners, to provide an ADA accessibility workshop. The University of Arkansas was chosen because of it's state wide reach. Mark Derry, ADA Accessibility Trainer, provided; Basic Training on ADA Standards for accessible design and Level 2 ADA accessibility survey training to disability advocates, service providers, coordinators, government officials and independent living personnel to provide skills necessary to assist individuals from transitioning youth and adults into appropriate and safe independent living environments with supported technologies.
Breifly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
ICAN has partnered with the University of Arkansas Currents Program (Center for Utilization of Rehabilitation Research for Education Network Training & Services) to provide training and workshops as they relate to IT accessibility. As part of this training, utube videos were provided to ICAN which were linked to ICAN's website. Noted under our resources page, these videos include WordPress Accessibility and Digital Accessibility Overview. To further assist our clients seeking information on IT accessibility, we have also linked NATAP's IT accessibility videos covering a wide range of subjects.
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 00 |
Training or Technique Assistance will be developed or implemented | 02 |
No known outcome at this time | 00 |
Nonrespondent | 00 |
Total | 02 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 100% |
RSA Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met |
Education | 0% |
---|---|
Employment | 50% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 0% |
Representative of Community Living | 50% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 0% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
ICAN worked with a local government human resources (HR) department. The HR department was seeking to meet objectives in hiring and retaining employees with disabilities. The staff was seeking various resources to provide to their employees and their families. The HR staff sought out training on specific technologies and intervention techniques to assist in helping employees with hearing loss and physical limitations. They wanted to know how the environment impacted hearing, vision and physical demands. They sought out ergonomic solutions. The staff requested specific assistive technology trainings with a variety of technologies to assist employees in the workplace and during the interview process.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
ICAN Program Manager, Rick Anderson worked with the parking task force in coordination with the Spinal Cord Commission. As a result of the task force, legislation was enacted to regulate parking for a person with a disability; to modify van-accessible parking and to create a class to promote awareness of parking compliance for persons with a disability. Ricks' expertise in mobility and seating and as an ATP (Assistive Technology Practitioner) contributed to task force moving the agenda smoothly and creating workable legislation.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. ICAN partnered with Arkansas Rehabilitation Services for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing to provide a community open house. During the open house we provided assistive technology tours, assistive technology demonstrations and presentations to the deaf and hard of hearing service providers, individuals with hearing impairment, their families, educators, employers and other stakeholders. This event provided an opportunity for people with hearing loss to view and learn about resources and technologies in one event. Presentations included vocational rehabilitation funding and employment services, telecommunication access funding and products, ICAN's loan and demonstration program, alternative financing program, benefits counseling, latest information from Arkansas School for the Deaf, and others. Approximately 70 people attended resulting in positive feedback and requests for future venues.
2. ICAN continues to seek new ways to reach Arkansas residents informing them of the benefits of assistive technology. This year ICAN redesigned and updated our website. The new website is accessible, current and easy to navigate. Our advisory council and stakeholders were key in the inception and design. The website is designed to assist a person in finding technology in a specific area of need. ICAN resource page includes IT accessibility and funding. We post trainings, reuse and other relevant information. The positive feedback from our consumers has been huge. The website also links to our Facebook page, in this way, we let our consumers know where we are exhibiting, presenting or training and invite them to attend. ICAN's Facebook posts have reached thousands across the state. We utilize Facebook along with our website to reach a diverse group of people across our state.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 509 | 01 | 510 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 371 | 02 | 373 |
Representative of Education | 50 | 00 | 50 |
Representative of Employment | 21 | 00 | 21 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 99 | 00 | 99 |
Representative of Community Living | 23 | 00 | 23 |
Representative of Technology | 03 | 00 | 03 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 1,076 | 03 | 1,079 |
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
---|
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? | No |
---|
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds |
---|
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Individuals Served | Other Outcome |
---|
Association of Assistive Technology Act Programs . Saved: Fri May 04 2018 15:20:19 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time)