National Assistive Technology Act Data System

Annual Progress Report - Full Report

Colorado 2023

General Information

Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)

State AT Program Title:
Assistive Technology Program of Colorado
State AT Program Title:
State AT Program URL
www1.ucdenver.edu/centers/cide
Mailing Address:
1224 5th St., The Hub
City:
Denver
State:
Colorado
Zip Code:
80204
Program Email:
cide@ucdenver.edu
Phone:
3033151280
TTY:

Lead Agency

Agency Name:
Center for Inclusive Design and Engineering
Mailing Address:
1224 5th St., The Hub
City:
Denver
State:
CO
Zip Code:
80204
Program URL:
www1.ucdenver.edu/centers/cide

Implementing Entity

Name of Implementing Agency:
Mailing Address:
City
State:
Zip Code:
Program URL:

Program Director and Other Contacts

Program Director for State AT Program (last, first):
Melonis, Maureen
Title:
Program Director
Phone:
303-315-1283
E-mail:
maureen.melonis@ucdenver.edu
Program Director at Lead Agency (last, first):
Melonis, Maureen
Title:
Program Director
Phone:
303-315-1283
E-mail:
maureen.melonis@ucdenver.edu
Primary Contact at Implementing Agency (last, first) - If applicable:
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director

Name (last, first):
Beems, Julia
Title:
Outreach Coordinator
Phone:
3033151284
E-mail:
julia.beems@ucdenver.edu

Certifying Representative

Name (last, first):
Bocco, Jeanne
Title:
Senior Postaward Accountant
Phone:
303-724-1157
E-mail:
Alougbavi.Bocco@cuanschutz.edu

State Financing

Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? No
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? No

B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? 0


C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? 0

D. Anecdote

Impact Area

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 00 00 00 00
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 00 00
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 00 00 00 00
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 00 00 00 00
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 00 00 00 00
9. Performance on this measure NaN% NaN% NaN%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 00 NaN%
Satisfied 00 NaN%
Satisfied somewhat 00 NaN%
Not at all satisfied 00 NaN%
Nonrespondent 00 NaN%
Total Surveyed 00
Response rate % NaN%

G. Notes:

Reutilization

A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices

Activity Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity
A. Device Exchange 03
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan 23
C. Total 26

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. 23
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 03

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance

Individuals belong to school districts and have an obligation to provide AT.

B. Device Exchange Activities

Device Exchange
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Exchanged Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged Savings to Consumers
Vision 00 $0 $0 $0
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech Communication 00 $0 $0 $0
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 00 $0 $0 $0
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 02 $710 $0 $710
Daily Living 01 $35 $0 $35
Environmental Adaptations 01 $50 $0 $50
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 00 $0 $0 $0
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 04 $795 $0 $795

C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities

Device Reassign/Repair/Refurbish and/or OEL
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold Savings to Consumers
Vision 01 $430 $0 $430
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech Communication 17 $50,068 $0 $50,068
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 01 $295 $0 $295
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 04 $4,210 $0 $4,210
Daily Living 00 $0 $0 $0
Environmental Adaptations 04 $452 $0 $452
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 06 $5,280 $0 $5,280
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 02 $418 $0 $418
Total 35 $61,153 $0 $61,153

D. Anecdote

One of our school district's has been the recipient of the Assistive Technology Program of Colorado's open ended loan program several times in the past year. It has made a positive impact for the students by allowing them access to assistive technology on a continuous basis. They received multiple iPads, switches, lighted mirrors for students with low vision, and other miscellaneous devices. Not only has the open ended loan program been an amazing resource for them to receive equipment for their students, but it has also been huge in terms of getting technology in the hands of staff and students long term while the student's funding process starts. The open ended loan program has also enabled them to start their own tech closet at the district level.

Small boy using a BIG MAC switch with a switch activated robot toy.
Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 00 00 03 03
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 00 00
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 00 00 03 03
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 00 00 03 03
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 00 00 03 03
9. Performance on this measure NaN% NaN% 100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 26 100%
Satisfied 00 0%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 26
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

We initiated a new system that changed how we collect information, which reduced our numbers this year. The University also has legal guidance that limits our ability to refurbish, and repair used equipment so are only able to count equipment we can redistribute as is. We have identified the need to increase our marketing of this program and currently working with the University for assistance.

Device Loan

A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose

Loans By Purpose
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan Number
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) 1,016
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding 43
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation 142
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity 29
Total 1,230

B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower

LOANS BY TYPE OF BORROWER
Type of Individual or Entity Number of Device Borrowers
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Individuals with Disabilities 00 00 00
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 00 00 00
Representative of Education 460 163 623
Representative of Employment 06 00 06
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 01 01 02
Representatives of Community Living 549 50 599
Representatives of Technology 00 00 00
Total 1,016 214 1,230

C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans

Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days 42

D. Types of Devices Loaned

Types of Devices Loaned
Type of AT Device Number of Devices
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Vision 19 12 31
Hearing 00 08 08
Speech Communication 503 56 559
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 316 85 401
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 63 23 86
Daily Living 39 29 68
Environmental Adaptations 28 22 50
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00 06 06
Computers and Related 31 01 32
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 17 37 54
Total 1,016 279 1,295

E. Anecdote

Borrowing a communication device from the statewide loan bank, allowed this young girl to communicate with her family as she looked at her books. The Via Pro by PRC-Saltillo has the LAMP Words for Life, TouchChat with WordPower, and Dialogue AAC apps with matching keyguards, which allowed this little one to trial the apps, then do a longer trial with LAMP. The vocabulary Builder feature in LAMP made it easy to focus on learning the motor plan for specific words to build her vocabulary. After a successful trial, funding paperwork has been approved by Medicaid, and this little communicator will be receiving her own purple ViaPro soon!

Small girl reading a book and using a communication device
Impact Area

F. Access Performance Measures

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 225 04 176 405
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 187 03 305 495
Subtotal 412 07 481 900
Have not made a decision 00 04 00 04
Subtotal 412 11 481 904
Nonrespondent 46 00 66 112
Total 458 11 547 1,016
Performance on this measure 100% 63.64% 100%

G. Acquisition Performance Measures

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 163 00 49 212
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 02 02
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 163 00 51 214
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 163 00 51 214
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 163 00 51 214
9. Performance on this measure 100% NaN% 100%

H. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 859 69.84%
Satisfied 218 17.72%
Satisfied somewhat 18 1.46%
Not at all satisfied 02 0.16%
Nonrespondent 133 10.81%
Total Surveyed 1,230
Response rate % 89.19%

I. Notes:

Device Demonstration

A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type

Type of AT Device / Service Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services
Vision 01
Hearing 05
Speech Communication 73
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 12
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 170
Daily Living 05
Environmental Adaptations 01
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00
Computers and Related 26
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00
Total # of Device Demonstrations 293

B. Types of Participants

Type of Participant Decision-Makers Other Participants Total
Individuals with Disabilities 171 50 221
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 112 86 198
Representatives of Education 06 19 25
Representatives of Employment 03 07 10
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 00 124 124
Representative of Community Living 01 11 12
Representative of Technology 00 57 57
Total 293 354 647

C. Number of Referrals

Referrals
Type of Entity Number of Referrals
Funding Source (non-AT program) 113
Service Provider 100
Vendor 123
Repair Service 80
Others 15
Total 431

D. Anecdote

Francesca V was a Sophomore in college when she was struck by a cyclist on campus that put her in the hospital where she received a preventative operation for another health condition. Due to complications during surgery Francesca was left with permanent anoxic brain damage and was completely blind. After relearning to talk, walk, and havigate the world, she decided to return to school. Francesca came to the Assistive Technology Program of Colorado Clinic for help. She had tried using Dragon Dictate and JAWS in the past but found their commands too difficult to memorize since her memory had also been affected by the brain injury. Her clinician was able find and demonstrate J-Say, a software that integrates Dragon with JAWS to make the verbal commands for more natural and easy to remember. Francesca completed her first semester of college with a high A, had one of her stories published in the school's literary magazines, and was honored for her achievement. Francesca stated that " my work with the clinic and the tools they taught me to use have made it possible to be independent again and get back to school."

Young woman sitting in front of computer
Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 26 29 142 197
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 08 03 79 90
Subtotal 34 32 221 287
Have not made a decision 04 02 00 06
Subtotal 38 34 221 293
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 38 34 221 293
Performance on this measure 89.47% 94.12% 100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 528 81.61%
Satisfied 113 17.47%
Satisfied somewhat 04 0.62%
Not at all satisfied 02 0.31%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total 647
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Overall Performance Measures

Overall Acquisition Performance Measure

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 163 00 52 215
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 02 02
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 163 00 54 217
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 163 00 54 217
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 163 00 54 217
9. Performance on this measure 100% NaN% 100% 100%
ACL Performance Measure 85%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Access Performance Measure

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 251 33 318 602
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 195 06 384 585
Subtotal 446 39 702 1,187
Have not made a decision 04 06 00 10
Subtotal 450 45 702 1,197
Nonrespondent 46 00 66 112
Total 496 45 768 1,309
Performance on this measure 99.11% 86.67% 100% 99.16%
ACL Performance Measure 90%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Satisfaction Rating

Customer Rating of Services Percent ACL Target Met/Not Met
Highly satisfied and satisfied 98.53% 95% Met
Response Rate 93.01% 90% Met

Training

A. Training Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution

Training by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number
Individuals with Disabilities 67
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 69
Representatives of Education 2,585
Representatives of Employment 103
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 294
Representatives of Community Living 426
Representatives of Technology 110
Unable to Categorize 191
TOTAL 3,845

Geographic Distribution of Participants
Metro Non Metro Unknown TOTAL
3,153 692 00 3,845

B. Training Topics

Trainings by Topic
Primary Topic of Training Participants
AT Products/Services 1,205
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice 84
Combination of any/all of the above 1,672
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access 883
Transition 01
Total 3,845

C. Description of Training Activities

Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:

Accessing the Fun Stuff: Active (and Meaningful) Participation for All Students - All students deserve to be able to participate in the “fun stuff” like music, art, gym, assemblies, classroom parties, and field days. This webinar explored why we need to provide meaningful, active participation to students, what barriers may be preventing their access, and how to support student participation in the special classes, special days, and special activities that inspire joy and excitement. Participants discovered AT devices available in the Loan Library that could help make the fun more accessible, as well as additional resources. There were 128 participants from 12 states and Canada.

Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

Thinking Outside the Classroom: AAC & Social Skills in the Post-Secondary Environment - The aim of this interactive session was to plan and prepare students with AAC for life after high school. It discussed evidence-based strategies to teach socials skills applicable in their lives after they leave the structure of high school and recedived ideas to adapt, and create activities that target social skills and AAC in the classroom. A comparison of friendship and functional skills were discussed. This training is on our website to support new school-based AT Providers.

Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:

CIDE delivered tailored training on Document Accessibility to Colorado Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHSEM) staff. The training was repeated on 4 occasions and was recorded for later viewing by DHSEM staff. Topics included Title: Inclusive by Design: A Training on Document Accessibility - Fundamental of Document Accessibility Title: Inclusive by Design: Accessible Slides and Basics of PDF Remediation - PowerPoint Accessibility and Converting Documents to PDF

D. IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure

IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received Number
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies 18
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented 848
No known outcome at this time 17
Nonrespondent 00
Total 883
Performance Measure Percentage 98.1%
ACL Target Percentage 70%
Met/Not Met Met

E. Notes:

Technical Assistance

A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance

Technical Assistance by Recipient Type
Education 40%
Employment 10%
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 00%
Community Living 50%
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) 00%
Total 100%

B. Description of Technical Assistance

Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:

The Larimer County Sheriff's Office requested CIDE do an accessibility analysis of the tablet computer provided to inmate's in the county's jail. The tablet is used for communications, grievances, purchases, legal research and entertainment. CIDE reviewed the manufacturer's VPAT for the tablet and its custom software and then went onsite to test the accessibility features and primary workflows. A report was provided and according to our contact at the sheriff's office, the manufacturer is implementing several recommendations.

Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

Community Connections, one of the local Community Centered Boards working with children with developmental delays, requested technical assistance in developing timelines for AT assessments for children approaching age 3 and how to communicate and collaborate with school districts during the Part B to Part C transition period. CIDE assisted in the development of a timeline for when Community Connections would no longer initiate new AT assessments in relation to the proximity of the child's third birthday, and assisted in the exploration of using their organization's iPads as a temporary AT support during the transition process. It was also determined to include AT data and information in the transition report so the child and family wouldn't need to start the process over during the final transition steps.

C. Notes:

Public Awareness

Public Awareness Activities

Public Awareness Narratives

Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.

1. Ability Summit - Building for the Brain: designing for cognitive inclusion - Webinar on designing for cognitive differences for the future of work across industries. Presenters included a multidisciplinary team of designers, researchers, and leaders in the cognitive disability community on how to create experiences that are inclusive for users across the cognitive spectrum. Individuals reached included: Industry, Academia, Microsoft senior leaders including CEO Satya Nadella, and policy leaders such as Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg, along with 20,000 attendees from 100 countries. Positive Outcome was the development of the Microsoft Disability Toolkit for designers.

2. The Future of Interface" Cognitive, Language and Learning Disabilities - Challenges and Approaches - a workshop presented by CU a Global Destination for Disability & Aging Innovation. CIDE, Coleman Institute, and industry partners Individuals reached included 1500 professionals across the health care disciplines and geriatric fields. Positive Outcomes included: participants leaving the presentation with practical tools to provide and optimize safe, effective, and patient-centered care.

Information And Assistance

Information And Assistance Activities by Recipient
Types of Recipients AT Device/
Service
AT Funding Total
Individuals with Disabilities 14,950 3,380 18,330
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 9,724 4,576 14,300
Representative of Education 22,490 4,056 26,546
Representative of Employment 2,392 598 2,990
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 10,452 1,872 12,324
Representative of Community Living 6,864 2,574 9,438
Representative of Technology 364 00 364
Unable to Categorize 00 00 00
Total 67,236 17,056 84,292

Referral Types:

Continued collaborations with our community partners provides for the majority of our referrals. Our new collaborations with the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing (HCPF) with our Digital Literacy and Surviving in Place programs have increased our referrals from the communities and agencies outside our typical reach. These programs were highlighted in HCPF newsletters and meetings along with increased social media posts from CIDE. Our newsletters have also publicized new programs and increased distribution resulting in additional referrals.

Referral Sources:

Our state-wide community partners and collaborators continue to be our primary source of referrals along with information distributed at various community events. We work with 19 Community Centered Boards (10% of referrals), with 63 AT Consultants in our Tech for Tykes program; 72 school districts (18% of referrals) with 102 team coordinators and 409 SWAAAC members in our school AT program; Colorado Commission for the Deaf, Hard of Hearing, Deaf/Blind Denver metro area (1% of referrals); Division of Vocational Rehabilitation 5 metro offices (10% of referrals); 128 Medical Professionals (50% of referrals) , 4 Equipment Vendors (3% of referrals), 9 Independent Living Centers (1% of referrals), Colorado Department of Health Care and Financing (5% of referrals) and 125 Emergency Managers and Planners (2% of referrals).

Notes:

Coordination/Collaboration and State Improvement Outcomes

Overview of Coordination/Collaboration Activities

Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 2

A. Coordination/Collaboration

1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?

The Assistive Technology Program of Colorado received $1.4 million from the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing (HCPF), the state Medicaid office, to provide emergency battery backup power systems, 1,000 emergency go kits, and four different trainings on emergency preparedness to Medicaid providers, Medicaid members/consumers, family members and caregivers. HCPF was responsible for marketing to providers and members, developing a tracking spreadsheet, and providing initial approvals. CIDE was responsible for the initial research and testing of three different power backup battery systems, development of the backup battery application, final approvals, and determination of the size of battery, distribution of acceptance letter and setup instructions, development of the go kit application, final approvals, and distribution of go kits. We were also responsible for the content develop of all four trainings (Plan, Prepare, and Respond for Medicaid providers; Train-the-Trainer for providers; Backup Battery Systems for providers, members, family members and caregivers; and Be Your Own First Responder for Medicaid members, family members, caregivers, and staff).

2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.

To date, we have received 758 applications and disseminated 565 emergency battery backup power units, received 168 applications, and disseminated 138 emergency go kits and have provided trainings in 4 locations across the state, with dates set for two more locations, plans for additional virtual trainings, and just-in-time online trainings.

3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?

Community Participation and Integration; Health; Aging; Aging and Disability Network / No Wrong Door; Veterans;

4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?

Training; Information & Assistance; Public Awareness; Technical Assistance;

A.2 Coordination/Collaboration (Entry 2)

1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?

The Assistive Technology Program of Colorado houses a University of Colorado Medicine Community Practice Clinic. We serve the disability community by providing wheelchair seating and mobility and augmentative alternative communication services as well as other assistive technology services. We serve a large percentage of Medicaid clients at our clinic thanks in large part to the recognition from the Upper Payment Limit support and Health First Colorado (Colorado's Medicaid Program). This collaboration provides leveraged funding for our efforts to increase our outreach efforts to the Medicaid community.

2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.

With this support, we experienced over a 40% increase in Medicaid visits YOY from FY21-FY22. FY23 experienced another 7.2% increase in Medicaid visits, and we expect this trend to continue as we provide necessary services which improve quality of life for this community.

3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?

Health; Aging; Aging and Disability Network / No Wrong Door; Veterans;

4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?

Device Loan; Demonstration; Reuse; Information & Assistance; Public Awareness;

Overview of State Improvement Activities

State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 02

B. State Improvements

1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.

The Assistive Technology Program of Colorado has worked closely this past year with the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (CDLE), for the benefit of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation (DVR) to rewrite a Memorandum of Understanding in order to improve collaborations between the two agencies and increase the assistive technology services and support individuals with disabilities receive. As a part of the new agreement, the two programs are expanding working relationships and entering into agreements for the coordination of activities, including the referral of individuals with disabilities to programs and activities such as device demonstrations, loans, and reuse.


2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)

The new 5-year agreement was signed and became effective 7/1/23 and includes commitments by both parties to support the assistive technology employment needs of individuals with disabilities in Colorado.


3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?

Employment


B.2 State Improvements

1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.

The Assistive Technology Program of Colorado worked in close collaboration with the Colorado Office of Employment First to improve access to digital health care resources provided by the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing (HCPF) and to promote increased self-determination and personal choice in health care decision making.


2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)

A digital literacy curriculum was researched, designed, and developed for people who receive long term Medicaid services and support from HCPF. The curriculum is stored on Moodle but is not available to the public.


3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?

Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation

Additional And Leveraged Funds

Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? Yes

A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities

Fund Source Amount Use of Funds Data Reported
Public/State Agency$98,832TrainingTrue
Public/State Agency$45,886Technical AssistanceTrue
Private$9,000Technical AssistanceTrue
Public/State Agency$10,250Technical AssistanceTrue
Public/State Agency$358,000TrainingTrue
Public/State Agency$121,459Technical AssistanceTrue
Public/State Agency$135,244Technical AssistanceTrue
Public/State Agency$2,454TrainingTrue
Private$5,900Technical AssistanceTrue
Public/State Agency$55,819Technical AssistanceTrue
Private$6,500Technical AssistanceTrue
Public/State Agency$299,600Device LoanTrue
Public/State Agency$3,250TrainingTrue
Public/State Agency$816,781Technical AssistanceTrue
Private$14,750Technical AssistanceTrue
Public/State Agency$388,671TrainingTrue
Public/State Agency$35,397Device LoanTrue
Public/State Agency$133,107Device LoanTrue
Public/State Agency$286,093Device LoanTrue
Public/State Agency$49,820TrainingTrue
Public/State Agency$25,762TrainingTrue
Private$30,000Technical AssistanceTrue
Public/State Agency$1,750Technical AssistanceTrue
Private$100,000TrainingTrue
Amount: $3,034,325

For any leveraged funding reported above for which data could not be reported, please describe the extenuating circumstances that precluded data from being reported and efforts to remediate the situation in future reporting periods.


C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).


Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Tue Feb 13 2024 14:01:21 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)


Back to state program information page | Top of page

This FY23 State AT Program Annual Progress Report was exported from the National Assistive Technology Act Data System (NATADS). NATADS was developed with partial support from the Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance.